altivo: Rearing Clydesdale (angry rearing)
Altivo ([personal profile] altivo) wrote2007-05-31 08:13 pm
Entry tags:

Witch hunts

OK, I think I'm cooled off enough to write about the stupidity of SixApart's behavior without blowing a gasket. If you don't want to hear it, skip over this.

This incident was nothing less than a witch hunt. Witch hunts NEVER reflect well on those who perpetrate them. They are ALWAYS judged badly when viewed from a historical perspective. It is made that much worse when the inspiration for the hunt was the accusations of an obvious lunatic fringe group that is dedicated to hating EVERYONE who is different from themselves. Not just possible or potential pedophiles, but everyone. Like gays, blacks, immigrants, women, non-Christians, ethnic minorities, and, no doubt, anyone who doesn't vote straight right wing candidates.

As with witch hunts everywhere and in every century, the utterly innocent were dragged into the pit along with the guilty or possibly guilty, merely because of association, vague resemblances, or semantic misinterpretation. SixApart acted like fools and assholes. There's no other way to put this, folks. They followed the hue and cry raised by a shill, and like a wild mob, started the lynch party rather than due process and fair evaluation.

You cannot condemn people for taking an interest in, discussing, or being curious about anything. I don't care what it is. Will you put the author of a murder mystery in jail? Yes, murder is illegal in our society. Will you put everyone who likes to read murder mysteries in jail as well? What if the author writes a novel in which the murderer gets away with the crime? What about a suspense novel in which an unpunished rape takes place? Furthermore, you can't assume, as SixApart did, that everyone who writes about or discusses murder is a murderer.

Whether it is 14th century Spain, 17th century England or Massachusetts, or 20th century Germany, the witch hunt is always, inevitably, and irrevocably wrong. It incriminates and punishes the innocent, and is manipulated to the personal glory and power of the perpetrator. Joseph McCarthy was just as wrong as Adolf Hitler, and Franklin Roosevelt committed equal atrocity when he allowed the Japanese Internment. The Bush administration is engaged in secret persecution and probably torture of innocent or only vaguely guilty people right now, simply because they speak the wrong language, are of the wrong religion, and happened to be in the wrong place at a bad time. SixApart is no better than these great criminals of past human history, and their apologies and promise to do better have no more value than those offered in the past by such people.

In a society that is supposedly dedicated to freedom of speech, religion, race, and culture, we seem still to be extremely narrow minded and quick to jump to potentially wrong conclusions. Worse yet, unlike chat rooms and other more notorious internet venues, LiveJournal is hardly a suitable forum for a genuine pedophile to use in attracting and injuring the innocent. Believe me, people who are up to such acts know how to choose their methods much more effectively than that.

Who will you go after next, SixApart? Homosexuals? Communists? Drug users? Illegal immigrants? Furries? Anyone who speaks a disparaging word about the current administration in Washington?

Frankly, this is an incident that calls for more than just empty words of apology. Those who decided to take this unilateral action and overreacted so extremely should resign their positions in the organization. It would be ludicrous, except that they are messing with people's lives and reputations here, and appointing themselves as a secret inquisition without appeal.

[identity profile] dragon-punk.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
I'm so very glad this all got resolved. Now, to punch WFI in the face for starting all this crap.

[identity profile] songcoyote.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Rant, pony, rant! Well said, and echoed by my heart's sense and my mind's interpretation of the event.

Thank you for speaking up. I hope it helped find your center.

Love and peace to you and yours.

Light and laughter,
SongCoyote
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, it's the kind of thing that never gets resolved. Once the egg is broken, you can't put it back into the shell. People who are unjustly accused of things considered really offensive by others are rarely ever considered innocent again, even if they are officially exonerated.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Hugs. It was worth the rant if it got you to break your silence. ;D

[identity profile] tinbender.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
It was a knee-jerk overreaction on behalf of people who more than likely aren't LJ users in the first place. If someone isn't part of the LJ community and doesn't like what they see, that's just too damn bad.

LJ's apology was pure crap as well. They claim Both in the instructions for profiles and in other places on the site we make it clear that interests listed should be evaluated within the context of “I like x”, “I’m in favor of x” or “I support x”. The fact is that the interests page only has this instruction: Rule of thumb: You should be able to put the interest in the sentence "I like ________". A "rule of thumb" is a far cry from "making it clear that interests are in the context of 'I like'." If 'Interests' are supposed to be 'Likes', then label them as such.

They go on to say As many profiles are the only public part of a private journal and profiles serve partly as an advertisement for people of like interests, it is important that the content of a profile can be evaluated as if it stands alone. If your profile were to express interest in pedophilia with no other content that describes this interest as in helping survivors or protecting children from it we must read the profile as “I like or I support or I’m in favor of it.” For this reason we suspended profiles that meet this criteria. Excuse me? They have no way of seeing private entries to check into complaints? I don't buy that for a minute and if someone makes a complaint on a page they can't see, then that complaint is baseless, much like their shallow excuses.

Going from their actual Terms of Service page, the only document that actually counts since it's in effectively a contract, the only thing that comes close is in Section XVI, number 13: Promote or provide instructional information about illegal activities, promote physical harm or injury against any governmental entity, group or individual, or promote any act of cruelty to animals. This may include, but is not limited to, providing instructions on how to assemble bombs, grenades, and other weapons or incendiary devices. I'm sorry, even if Interests meant Likes, someone saying they like something like pedophilia is a far cry from promoting it.

Sounds to me like they're trying their damnedest to cover their asses when they have nothing to cover them with. Anyone with a paid subscription should consider filing a class action lawsuit for slander and breach of contract.

[identity profile] lobowolf.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
Although I never made my own post about this, I think you phrased it more eloquently than I ever could have. I'm sorry to say, I think this incident is a perfect example of an individual or group invoking the "I did it for the children" clause. Invoking this clause allows you to play the morality card and (apparently) allows you free reign to break as many rules and laws as you want, and if you can get enough people to join your wagon-train, you can get away with it. The Bush administration has done this over and over again, to the point where people are used to the president and the administration simply throwing the rule-book out the window. "We did it to protect YOU from the terrorists, so that justifies breaking any law we want and throwing civil rights, free speech, and due process into the toilet."

Six Apart, buckling under pressure from some whackjob morality group merely changed the word "terrorists" to "pedophiles" and proceeded with the witch-hunt, and proceeded to play the role of judge, jury, and executioner.

Piss-poor behaviour from people who should know better.

Corporations...

[identity profile] avon-deer.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 08:03 am (UTC)(link)
I always knew it would be a downwards spiral as soon as adverts started appearing on LJ.

[identity profile] hellmutt.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 08:46 am (UTC)(link)
Well said. Kinda wish you'd email the same to 'em... not that I imagine anyone would listen. I bet they're all cowering from their inboxes at the moment.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
That half-baked incomprehensible statement he's making about interests really aggravates me. So since I list sheep, horses, dogs, and cats among my interests, someone can say that means I'm a sexual abuser of animals and should be silenced. That's what SixApart is guilty of doing: twisting and interpreting simple statements of interest or curiosity into condemnatory admissions. This is EXACTLY like what McCarthy and his minions did during the 1950s, and like what the Nixon and Bush administrations have tried to do by painting anyone who disagrees with them as a treasonous criminal who has violated the sanctity of the nation. SixApart set off an inquisition using morons for judges, and needs to be called to task for doing so.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 10:50 am (UTC)(link)
It's the corporate mentality and falls exactly in line with those stupid warnings on all sorts of products. I've been meaning to write about the one that now appears on packets of "100% natural cheese." It says "WARNING: Contains milk."
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

Re: Corporations...

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 10:52 am (UTC)(link)
You're right of course. That was a bad sign. Actually, the SixApart takeover was a bad sign and I've been sort of waiting for something like this to come down the tube. Having a paid account means I don't see the ads, but I imagine like most sites that carry ads, many of them are for dubious or obnoxious products and services, that make this whole episode a case of utter hypocrisy.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 10:54 am (UTC)(link)
I doubt that there's any way to actually get an e-mail through to the desk of such lawyer-whipped turkeys.

[identity profile] vimsig.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
You are right of course, no condemnation for hypocrisy will reach their 'shell-likes' but it's wise to register contempt for the action.

Maybe the next swipe will be at those who are against global economics and evangelical war-mongering - that'll be me gone then!
ext_185737: (Rex - Gimme a break...)

[identity profile] corelog.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
My first instinct, honestly, is to duck my head and let all the drama pass over. It didn't affect me, and I didn't even know about it until it was over. However, I am reminded of the old story along the lines of, "Then they came for me, and there was nobody left to help."

There's no doubt somebody blew it. Big time. Resignations would be nice, but I doubt we'll see much of that. I'd join a class-action suit, but I'm not about to launch one. Besides which, I'm not even sure any lawyer would take on a class-action suit on these grounds. This particular morality card still carries too much weight in our society.

I don't know who started this or why. To me, it doesn't matter. SixApart's response should have been measured and considered beforehand, and they should have acted with restraint, not abandon. Instead, they were totally foolish. It's disappointing in the extreme, but I'm not sure how we can make that clear to SA and LJ administration. Which I dislike, because I much prefer making my grievances heard. Loudly.
deffox: (Shrine)

[personal profile] deffox 2007-06-01 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Well stated.

Though how would you interpret what happened on Myspace; or compare it to the Livejournal purge?

http://redtape.msnbc.com/2007/05/myspace_and_sex.html

Without making any value statements about the registry existing in the first place, it looks like they at least did some research first.

[identity profile] songcoyote.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I... well, heck. I have been silent. Too silent.

I read all your entries, though, even if I don't comment :) I've had a lot going on recently... wait, enough of that tired old excuse. In truth I just haven't felt like taking the time to comment lately on just about anyone's journal. I'm not withdrawn, just... distracted.

Don't think it's because of you. I recently re-read your letter to me and I pat the wee soft pony you sent regularly. You are in my thoughts even if I'm not saying much :)

Light and laughter,
SongCoyote
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't worry, I pretty much figured that was the situation. :)
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Given the path that this incident took, the next similar strike could be at anyone targeted by a strident and hysterical hate group. All they have to do is point fingers and screech loudly enough, and SixApart will start purging users like crazy.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
We need to present a demand. Not to SixApart, because they are obviously a bunch of mindless turkeys. But to Brad Fitz, who is still nominally in charge of LJ as a SixApart wholly owned subsidiary. I suspect this whole thing would have been much more measured and tempered had Brad not been on vacation when the lightning struck.

There needs to be a much better definition of a process. One that allows for evaluation and appeal, and does not permit LJ or SixApart to simply "disappear" people at will without comment or explanation, or hold them incommunicado without due process. The same rights should apply online as in real life. It appears that SixApart went totally apeshit on this thing and wildly suspended journals that contained nothing relevant to the accusations. Furthermore, in restoring some suspended journals, they have made threats against the users, telling them they must remain silent about what happened to them and why, or they will be suspended again. That is so much like the Bush administration that it stinks to high heaven.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-01 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually I have serious questions about the validity of the methods used by myspace. They probably committed the same sort of error that SixApart just did. SixApart, of course, was trying to avoid the kind of negative publicity that myspace was getting last year. I hope they get it in spades anyway.

I don't care WHAT the crime is that you want to accuse someone of, they are entitled to due process. That does NOT mean summary execution, in silence, without a presentation of charges, an opportunity to respond, and a proper trial with a chance of appeal.

I happen to have a very common name in real life. There are convicted drug dealers, rapists, and sex offenders with the same name. I have actually been accused of being one of them in the past. I don't think highly of this sort of "guilty until proven innocent, and we aren't going to give you any chance to prove your innocence" attitude.

Pedophilia is still one of the biggest, most hysterical taboos of our culture. People go nuts on it and just can't think rationally when they believe it is involved. A lot of wrong-headed and extremely unjust actions follow, along with a lot of false accusations. It is absolutely essential that such serious charges be treated rationally and with a cool head. SixApart has totally failed the test.
deffox: (Shrine)

[personal profile] deffox 2007-06-02 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
Actually I have serious questions about the validity of the methods used by myspace.

OK. I can agree with that.

I happen to have a very common name in real life.

I've dealt with that problem myself. I toyed with the idea of changing my name for seven years before doing it. The catalyst was being mistaken for someone else which nearly caused legal problems.

one of the biggest, most hysterical taboos of our culture.

Oh certainly. Someone in my parent's hometown got out of jail in two years for first degree murder (was crazy, but feels much better now). Yet this issue they follow you for life more than anything else.
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-02 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Well, no one can accuse you of having a common name any more. I thought it must be some family heirloom that was passed down to you, it never occurred to me that you might have chosen it for such a reason. ;D

[identity profile] cabcat.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 11:26 am (UTC)(link)
I wondered what all the kerfuffle was O.O
Time to get the Guilotine out
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)

[identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
No guillotines, please. That's the sort of garbage SixApart was just engaged in. I prefer slow torture, the Chinese methods. But only to be applied to fat-headed, incompetent, overzealous administrators.

[identity profile] cabcat.livejournal.com 2007-06-03 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
It was more a reference to the Jacobins whose leasders in the end got the chop themselves. Jacobins being kind of like the 6Apart group you could say.