From numerous people. At least I choose the less rude wording of the results:
I am smarter than 96.99% of the rest of the world.
Find out how smart you are.
Since I got all 25 answers right, I presume this means that approximately 3% of all people who take the test get them all right. Note that it says "smarter" rather than that I have a higher IQ. Many of these questions depend on the ability to quickly recall the relationship between metric measurements and English, or other such factoids. A reference librarian should be expected to score at the high end of such a test.
[Edit: As of 14:05 the next day, the percentile ranking for a perfect score has risen to 99.78. I sort of wondered if discussion of the questions would raise the number of people getting higher scores, but apparently not, or at least not yet.]
I am smarter than 96.99% of the rest of the world.
Find out how smart you are.
Since I got all 25 answers right, I presume this means that approximately 3% of all people who take the test get them all right. Note that it says "smarter" rather than that I have a higher IQ. Many of these questions depend on the ability to quickly recall the relationship between metric measurements and English, or other such factoids. A reference librarian should be expected to score at the high end of such a test.
[Edit: As of 14:05 the next day, the percentile ranking for a perfect score has risen to 99.78. I sort of wondered if discussion of the questions would raise the number of people getting higher scores, but apparently not, or at least not yet.]
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:12 am (UTC)Want to do my physics homework?
Kidding of course, but it would be nice if it were done.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:19 am (UTC)As an Australian resident, I'm not expected to make imperial/metric conversions (I only know them in detail because I like numbers) nor know the political geography of America (however I did know that the common language in Brazil was portuguese).
I think it'd be interesting to construct a series of these with a greater range of questions to test for such. I can also think of a few people I know who would be able to do so ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:51 am (UTC)Intelligence has far less practical application than you'd think :D
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 06:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 09:29 am (UTC)DEfinite US bias. I wonder how people would fare with a quiz with a finnish bias :)
Anyway, interesting to see why themakers of these quizzes need to compare their "intelligence" and try to make themselves feel better because thay are smarter than the others. I bet the maker of that quiz only picked the questions he knew the answers to so he could get the first 100%... :)
But my, you are a smart horsie. I am just a dumb zebra from Finland :P
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:25 am (UTC)The percentile should in fact vary up and down as more and more people take the thing. In theory, it will stabilize once the sample gets large enough. From what different people have said overnight, the percentile value of a perfect score is still climbing, and is now well over the 98th.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:26 am (UTC)Be sure and watch out for the mouse trap in there...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:48 am (UTC)Your Number Correct: 16/25
Average Number Correct: 18.78/25
Percentile: 22.77%
Kinda proves I never got me an edumacation. Ah well.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:51 am (UTC)As I've said, though, US schools don't teach geography any more and they do little more than touch on metric measures in passing. I expect that Americans under the age of 30 will not do well on this test either.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 02:36 pm (UTC)Now that would be just awesome. It could involve counting recently dead pop artists.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:52 pm (UTC)I understand what you mean. Actually, in many bookstores here, the gay literature shelves have all but disappeared. The reason is that many of the authors who appeared there ten years ago are now in the mainstream, like Felice Picano for instance.
I have in the past preferred to go to a specialty bookstore that features gay and lesbian writers, such as Unabridged Books in Chicago. Now that I don't live in Chicago and it's way too far to go just for books, I usually order from Amazon. ;p
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 07:51 pm (UTC)I got 'em all right, and my percentile at test time was 99.21, so I think you're right about the number eventually settling down.
Not a "useful" test, I think, but a briefly amusing one :)
Light and laughter,
SongCoyote
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 07:58 pm (UTC)The trick questions were clever, but the choice of subject matter on which to build them was painfully parochial.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 11:29 am (UTC)