Came home to discover a large antique radio cabinet in the garage. Gary pulled it in from one of the neighbors' trash piles. It's all intact and except for a lot of dust, appears to be in good restorable condition. General Electric, I'm guessing pre-WW2 vintage, but no model identification remains. I think it might be fun to repair and restore this, but it will be on hold until after the holidays at least.
 |
GE Radio cabinet front closed
I'm sure the pulls are supposed to have little dangly brass ornaments or loops but those are gone. The wood is in surprisingly good condition, though, except for a few chips on the top. Approx. dimensions are 60 in. high, 32 in. wide, and 18 in. deep. |
 |
GE Radio cabinet front open
Speaker grill work and cloth is intact. It appears to be AM band only, with knobs for tone, volume, and tuning. On-off is the tiny knob below the tuning dial. A brass toggle switch on the center of the right hand side of the cabinet is probably a fringe-local switch for the tuning circuit. |
 |
GE Radio rear view
Two chassis, the top being the receiver, the bottom being the power supply and audio amplifier I think. No label remains with model information, alas. The one at the center behind the top chassis just says that the manufacturer recommends genuine RCA tubes. I'm betting that the large loudspeaker is one of those "dynamic" speakers that has a large DC choke coil instead of permanent magnets, and the power supply uses that coil as a filter choke. That explains the practice of putting the power rectifier next to the speaker along with the audio amplifier stage. |
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:18 am (UTC)I am left with only one working console radio at the present time, a Rogers Batteryless of similar age to the GE pictured above, though I had two other Philco radios of the pre to mid-WWII era. And, as hypocritical as it may sound, space reasons really did force me to get rid of them.
Radios of this era are fascinating, but I've found that keeping them in operable condition can be quite costly, depending on the model rarity and the array of various tubes required. While they are fine to simply look at, nothing beats the warm sound of vacuum tubes.
Good luck with the future restoration. : D
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:22 am (UTC)http://www.mcclellans.com/images/RadioCollection/Dandridge/DynamicDemoGE.JPG
http://www.mcclellans.com/NewRadiosPage.htm
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:38 am (UTC)That's what I was thinking immediately when I saw it. :-) It looks similar, maybe, to one he posted a picture of in his journal?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:38 am (UTC)That McClellan collection is pretty impressive and certainly shiny. I'd love to have just one of those old Atwater Kents. And I've hungered after one of those old "farm" sets in the cathedral or tombstone shape for a long time. The only affordable ones I find are always gutted and losing all their veneer.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:46 am (UTC)If it's as old as
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 02:56 am (UTC)When I first became interest in 1979, people were practically giving radios away, but once it became an "established" hobby in the late 80's, prices skyrocketed, and since I didn't have any money at that time, I couldn't afford to buy any nice radios.
I do want to get back into fixing them, and I'm in the process of rebuilding my test bench so I can do so, but "stuff" really drives me up the wall and I like the house free of excess clutter, whether it be radios or whatnot. I would consider collecting again if I could build a barn like Aerofox's...the barn I have isn't weathertight and it's very small, so the radios would get ruined.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:24 am (UTC)Because there's IF section and no conversion, the audio on TRF sets is fantastic. The down side is that there's no AVC, so if you crank it up to hear a soft station, and then tune across a loud one....KAWHAM! Oy. :P
Assuming the power transformer is good, it probably wouldn't be too hard to get running.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:29 am (UTC)Hard to say what's wrong with the Philco without looking at it, but power transformers don't go bad that often..probably needs new electrolytics and paper caps, and maybe a rectifier tube. Early to mid 30's radios are my favorite, particularly Philcos and Zeniths. Post-war sets are just completely different to me...there are some nice ones, but they just don't seem to have as much class.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:50 am (UTC)Must be a lot of RF stages. No wonder it was apparently receiving on just a two foot loop of wire instead of a real antenna. Could be great for late night broadcast band DX with a real antenna attached, but I'm familiar with the volume phenomenon you mention... I won't even think of putting headphones on it.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 03:59 am (UTC)It is possible that the primary is open on the transformer, which would suck :/
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 08:53 am (UTC)Goodness knows what kind of news broadcasts that thing has shouted out in it's time. Maybe the famous coverage of the Hindenburg disaster. The outbreak of WWII. JFK's assasination. The mind boggles.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-24 10:23 am (UTC)Now the JFK assassination is probably too late. By then, everyone was watching television and this set was already stored somewhere gathering dust, but I'll bet it covered the bombing of Japan at the end of the war, and that infamous election where the press declared Dewey the winner but Truman actually won the presidency.