Productive?
Oct. 28th, 2007 10:08 pmMade breakfast. Worked on the Alpha for a bit. Tried to work on writing. When Gary and his mom came back from church, then it was time for lunch, so fixed that. Then they went back to Chicago because he had to "dance the dark Morris" at sunset. (It's a Terry Pratchett thing.)
Cleaned barns. Took Tess out to the pasture. Drove into Woodstock and picked up my show entries. I didn't realize until now how many there were, since I submitted them in several small batches. Also got stuff for two other people who couldn't be there, and brought it all home.
Gary was going to be back at 8 pm so I planned dinner for 8. He called at 7:30 to say he wasn't going to make it. So... had dinner by myself, left his covered on top of the range. Set up the new aquarium with the bottled water he brought back after church. It looks nice, and runs very quietly, which is good.
Listened to
corelog who was kinda mopey tonight. That's his right, I guess. I seemed to be managing to press the wrong buttons so I just shut up and listened mostly. Now it's bed time. Work tomorrow, bleahh.
Cleaned barns. Took Tess out to the pasture. Drove into Woodstock and picked up my show entries. I didn't realize until now how many there were, since I submitted them in several small batches. Also got stuff for two other people who couldn't be there, and brought it all home.
Gary was going to be back at 8 pm so I planned dinner for 8. He called at 7:30 to say he wasn't going to make it. So... had dinner by myself, left his covered on top of the range. Set up the new aquarium with the bottled water he brought back after church. It looks nice, and runs very quietly, which is good.
Listened to
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 04:33 am (UTC)As far as you and buttons, I'll just say that you seem to be consistently of the mind that nobody who gets paid for software is good or makes anything useful. Further, that only those people who do not get paid for software are worth any amount of anybody's time, even if the software is buggy, doesn't work, or is poorly documented. That may not be your stance on things, or it might be; it doesn't really matter.
I am personally of the mind that those who help me deserve my support in return. While some software I've used isn't perfect (Trillian and ignitionServer are the first two examples to come to mind; Ubuntu is another), all of those packages filled a purpose to a level that I deemed acceptable. Therefore, I continue to use those packages and give the developers a good long chance to fix things, as long as core functionality remains the same.
You don't see things the same way I do. I realize this. I accept this. I wonder, however, if my choices can or will ever be considered respectable by you.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 10:31 am (UTC)There. I really said nothing about software until you brought it up last night. And you immediately put me in a position where it didn't matter what I said, I would have been wrong.
I really, truly, don't care what software you use. I do think that people who charge money for their software have a much higher obligation to deliver a reliable and well-documented product. Charging a price (sometimes a very high one) and then hiding behind a TOS agreement that says, in essence "We don't guarantee anything and aren't responsible if it doesn't work or does terrible things" is pretty despicable in my opinion. That would apply to Microsoft. It doesn't apply to any of the others you named unless, in fact, you paid for them.
Now as for the "nothing to do" situation, that one puzzles me. I can pretty honestly say I've not found myself in that state for so long that I can hardly remember it. You seem much too bright and creative to have that problem.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 10:33 am (UTC)Seriously, his group have been doing the Dark Morris for several years now. They were one of the first to publicize it in the US at least.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 11:45 am (UTC)But outside of that, does the dark morris actually exist? The Wikipedia entry sure reads like it mostly refers to Terry's version, mentioning octiron bells and all that.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 01:09 pm (UTC)In essence, all I was looking to do was to prove that the developers aren't breaking things on purpose out of sheer spite. Asking if the software had been updated since the fix was fine. Reassuring me that they wouldn't rest until they break that feature again put me in a sour mood, as it seems to demonstrate the kind of animosity and/or grudge that won't look at facts. Which is why I'm not going to bother to discuss it with you again. I know you hate closed-source, love open-source, hate alpha and beta, love stable builds, and dislike companies that get paid for their work (since none of them put out a product that's stable enough or documented enough for your liking). I'll leave it like that.
As for having nothing to do...honestly, there isn't anything interesting to do. I could drive places, but all that does is use gas. There's nothing to do at the park, aside from walk around in circles. I hear they put in a new disc golf course, but I'm not exactly all that interested in disc golf, and I don't have a Frisbee. Still, like I said, I found something to do, in the form of video games. They are the kind that I play when I have nothing else to do and nobody to talk to, so it's appropriate that I'd be playing them now.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 03:08 pm (UTC)That's a bit of an exaggeration. There are commercial software companies that I am pretty well satisfied with, such as Userful (which happens to be a Canadian company by the way) and Innovative, both of whose products I use daily. Remember too that I used to work for a commercial software house, so my thoughts on the whole subject contain some inside knowledge as well as the more visible elements.
On the other hand, some non-profit, open source groups are doing a stellar job. Mozilla is one such, and though I have complaints there they so far are nothing like the massive objections I have to Microsoft. Another such is OpenOffice.org. I also find that Debian is doing a darned good job overall. Ubuntu may be improving, I haven't looked again since last winter. I just wasn't at all impressed with them at that time.
E.M.O.
Date: 2007-10-29 03:37 pm (UTC)My ex and I often had/have discussion where we disagreed most vehemently, even got into a few fights over stuff. It takes a certain mindset to press an opinion and certain mindset to back down when it's obvious no agreement can be reached. I could ramble on about throwing furniture and wrestling until someone got hurt, but my point is, I- or him, come to think of it- could relate. Heh, human emotions... they can be a bother sometimes.
Re: E.M.O.
Date: 2007-10-29 03:59 pm (UTC)You may have some difficulty locating The Song of the Loon. It's been out of print for decades (originally published about 1966) and isn't the sort of thing that libraries are likely to have. It's not hard-core porn, but is definitely soft-core stuff and was very blatant for its time. Today it might seem tame, but I have a real fondness for Richard Amory's writing. There's actually a trilogy:
These are loosely connected by shared characters and situations. A fourth book, Willow Song, is my real favorite, and it has some overlap with the other three. Amory also wrote a couple of mysteries in academic settings, Frost being the one that comes to mind. I think he was a professor of languages or something, because he often inserts quotations or slogans in Latin, Spanish, French, and even Nahuatl.
Re: E.M.O.
Date: 2007-10-29 04:05 pm (UTC)Re: Richard Amory
Date: 2007-10-29 04:05 pm (UTC)Re: Song of the Loon
Date: 2007-10-29 04:08 pm (UTC)Re: Richard Amory
Date: 2007-10-29 04:14 pm (UTC)Re: Song of the Loon
Date: 2007-10-29 04:16 pm (UTC)Re: Song of the Loon
Date: 2007-10-29 04:29 pm (UTC)Used book stores and large used book sales often yield surprising fruit (no pun intended, or maybe it is intended...) The Amory novels were all published in mass market paperback editions, so they may be kind of beat up by now, but they still turn up on those tables of "paperbacks for a dime" at rummage and book sales. As it happens, my copies of the first two novels in the trilogy came from a used book store for 25 cents each. They were with the children's books! The covers are a bit deceiving and evidently someone thought they were like Peter Pan or else some sort of western story. They do in fact resemble those Scholastic Press paperback editions that are printed up in large quantities on cheap paper for use in the classroom. However, anyone who reads past the first couple of pages is NOT going to put these in the children's section. I always browse any stack of old paperback westerns though, just in case one turns up there.
Re: Song of the Loon
Date: 2007-10-29 04:34 pm (UTC)Re: Song of the Loon
Date: 2007-10-29 04:51 pm (UTC)I remember seeing Amory's books on the racks in the bookstore when I was an undergrad, but at that time I would have been much too embarrassed to actually buy them. In fact, I was almost too naive to catch on to what they were, but picking one up and looking inside left little doubt.
What was impressive at the time was the fact that Amory really does write about relationships and really does give you character development. His writing is a bit flowery for some tastes, I suppose, but it's not sloppy like cheap porn or romance novels. It's definitely literary. His 19th century old west/frontier settings have a particular appeal for me too, being the Miniver Cheevy type myself.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 05:45 pm (UTC)That being said, I do agree that there's a lot of crap going on on Wikipedia, unfortunately, and that a disappointingly large number of people seem to be intent on deleting as much as possible and annoying others to the largest possible extent. >_>
I'm not personally one of those; I like to be inclusive, but Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia, so an article on an entirely fictional dance might not be on-topic. Or, well, thinking about it, it probably is, but it should be noted that it's fictional; right now, the article seems to present an in-Discworld view, which certainly is not good, so at the very least, it should be rewritten.
Ah well. :)