LOTR Geekdom!
Apr. 17th, 2005 11:08 pmFrom
quaxo, and I imagine the ones I missed were in the last group that had only to do with Peter Jackson's awful movie version.
| LOTR Nerd Congratulations! You scored 93! |
You've read the books, seen the movies, and love the story...some may make fun, but that's alright. You are truly an LOTR Nerd! |
|
My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
| Link: The LOTR nerd test Test written by riotgrrl728 on OkCupid Free Online Dating |

no subject
Date: 2005-04-17 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 03:40 am (UTC)Librarian's memory for books and details. The quiz is muddied by Jackson's distortions, of course. I feel that he filmed an entirely different story than the one Tolkien wrote.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-18 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-19 03:30 am (UTC)Although I went to see the third, I was very disappointed by then. The pointless alterations in the storyline and language, the fouling of Faramir's character, the totally wrong focus... Despite Jackson's apparent fascination with Tolkien, I don't think he understands the literature at all. The real story, of the end of an eon of archetypes and nobility, was barely touched upon. The sense of a history that covered thousands of years was lost. All came down to a silly Hollywoodish romance and a lot of Star Wars-like special effects.