Well, yes, there's good and then there's saccharine. Barney is the latter.
I didn't realize he had been inflicted on you folks in Europe. I thought surely he was too obnoxiously unsophisticated to play there. Sorry you had to even see him.
And yes, I'd kind of prefer a different background than Barney. Since he's not purple though, I'll pretend it's someone else. ;)
It asks "Which European country are you most like" or something like that. And it includes Canada. Just how does one relocate a large country to a smallish continent? Did they fold it up and stick it in between Germany and France?
I came out with the same result as you, but I don't believe it simply because of the Canada thing.
Several of the questions had answers that were patently absurd, the Canada as a European country response being one of those. I answered that question with "England". I don't know how they would interpret a response of "Canada": naive and therefore presumed good, or deliberately trying to fudge the results and therefore evil?
Although it's hard to tell for certain from this vantage point, "good" is probably the best way to describe you, especially when I consider recent events and advice.
However, I maintain my assertion that everyone retains the ability to do both good and evil. It just depends on the all of the variables in the equation...
Yah, I got that too. ^^ I'm good when I want to be.. but when I'm bored, or mad.. I come up with some stuff that'd make the scarriest goth shake in fear. ^^;;; I don't know how many ways i've thought of to make working bombs or killing people.. whoops, stop the rant there. XD;;;;;;
Yes, stop that one right there. In this era of Patriot Act and Homeland Security, and with the paranoia about high school massacres and rampages, you don't want to be talking like that to anyone, even if you think they can't tell who you are.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 04:46 am (UTC)"I know you're good, hon.
*snicker*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 09:07 am (UTC)I didn't realize he had been inflicted on you folks in Europe. I thought surely he was too obnoxiously unsophisticated to play there. Sorry you had to even see him.
And yes, I'd kind of prefer a different background than Barney. Since he's not purple though, I'll pretend it's someone else. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 10:19 am (UTC)I came out with the same result as you, but I don't believe it simply because of the Canada thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 12:28 pm (UTC)Chunnelada!
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 12:28 pm (UTC)"You're a good pup, yes indeed ..."
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 01:58 pm (UTC)However, I maintain my assertion that everyone retains the ability to do both good and evil. It just depends on the all of the variables in the equation...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 03:12 am (UTC)Sure. And they retain the ability to decide whether they will do either. That's where the "being good" or "being evil" comes into the equation.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 01:44 am (UTC)Not that there's anything wrong with that. I'd much rather have your shortcomings than mine. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-28 02:02 am (UTC)But in another sense, they were "evil" only to achieve what I considered a "good" end, and they weren't around for very long.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-25 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 03:14 am (UTC)