No surprise here
Sep. 29th, 2005 07:04 pm| Neutral-Good 86% Good, 40% Chaotic |
| I'm starting a longer version of this test, and I would REALLY appreciate some suggestions for questions from members of all alignments. Please email me with a suggestion, along with the alignment you scored on this test. THANK YOU!! I will make it a seperate test and will include tendencies, kinda like the "Long Scientific Personality Test vs. the Quick and Dirty Personality test. Plane of Existence: Elysium, "Blessed Fields". Description: The plane of peace. Notable Inhabitants: Guardinals - noble immortal humanoids with bestial features. Examples of Neutral-Goods (Ethically Neutral, Morally Good) Mother Theresa Ghandi Sidhartha Gautama (the Buddha) Gandalf Bilbo & Frodo Baggins Samwise Gamgee Indiana Jones The Dali Lama Ben (O-Bi-Wan) Kenobi Luke Skywalker Harry Potter Hermionie Dumbledore Often goes along with the laws and desires of the group as being the easiest course of action, but ethical considerations clearly have top priority. May pursue quite abstract goals. Often aloof and difficult to understand. Will keep their word to others of good alignment Would not attack an unarmed foe Will not use poison Will help those in need May work with others Indifferent to higher authority Indifferent to organizations Neutral Good "Benefactor" A neutral good [person] will obey the law, or break it when he or she sees it will serve a greater good. He or she is not bound strongly to a social system or order. His or her need to help others and reduce their suffering may take precedence over all else. Neutral good [people] do good for goodness' sake, not because they are directed to by law or by whim. This alignment desires good without bias for or against order. Other Alignments and Tendencies (Tendenices are what you would more often sway towards; esp. for Neutrals): 0-39% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Evil 0-39% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: Neutral-Evil 0-39% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Evil 40-60% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Neutral 40-60% Good, 40-60% Chaotic: True Neutral 40-60% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Neutral 61-100% Good, 0-39% Chaotic: Lawful-Good 61-100% Good, 61-100% Chaotic: Chaotic-Good |
|
My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
| Link: The Alignment Test written by xan81 on Ok Cupid |

no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 06:49 pm (UTC)I keep thinking that somewhere there's a giant database keeping track of all your results and compiling them for..........something.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 08:00 pm (UTC)But what if you put all of the results together?
All the results of every test. Every quiz. Every poll.
And how do they know it's you?
Oh they know.
They know.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 06:52 pm (UTC)68% Good, 46% Chaotic
no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 11:46 pm (UTC)"... but ethical considerations clearly have top priority. "
Am I the only one seeing it contradict itself here?
Also, since when did ethics = law? Laws can be unethical, but the gist of at least part of the survey seems to imply that all laws are ethical, and (by extension) only an unethical person would break a law. I very much beg to differ ...
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 02:43 am (UTC)Morality itself is not cut and dried. (Begging to differ here with some folks who think it is.) It can bend and change depending on situations, societies, individuals... But once perceived, then ethics constitutes the carrying out of morality.
This quiz writer confuses moral ethics with civil law in several places.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 09:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 09:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-02 08:08 am (UTC)really know you, but from your online persona I'd
give this result a 60%.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-02 08:20 am (UTC)