Success...I think.
<==Download podcast here.
A ten minute discussion of the beginnings of furry literature in English, featuring the work of Anna Sewell, Marshall Saunders, and Felix Salten. Listeners invited to comment here or via e-mail (address contained in podcast).
<==For those brave enough to want to subscribe.
Written transcript also available upon request. I was worried about background noises and such during recording, but had more trouble figuring out the technology of Audacity and the USB headset. I believe the quality of the result is more than adequate, though. Hope you enjoy it. :)
A ten minute discussion of the beginnings of furry literature in English, featuring the work of Anna Sewell, Marshall Saunders, and Felix Salten. Listeners invited to comment here or via e-mail (address contained in podcast).
Written transcript also available upon request. I was worried about background noises and such during recording, but had more trouble figuring out the technology of Audacity and the USB headset. I believe the quality of the result is more than adequate, though. Hope you enjoy it. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 11:38 am (UTC)I noticed Jack London didn't make your cut, either ... too common? heh.
London (Call of the Wild) and Montgomery (Yellow Eyes) are both names that come to mind for me, specifically, when thinking of writers of furry fiction who endeavoured to un-demonize natural predators. Sadly, they fell very much on predominantly deaf ears within the U.S. powers that be, as evidenced by the complete extermination of the wolf from the vast majority of the U.S. (aside from Alaska) through the 1950s.
I also remember reading "Pleasant Journeys" by Pleasant DeSpain when I was a child, featuring some stories I remember being furry ... another book you might want to peruse on the topic.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:16 pm (UTC)Aw, thanks. Time spent as an actor and a singer undoubtedly helps, but I'm sure many think I sound too "fruity". ;P
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:22 pm (UTC)For the most part, Donald Duck aside, our voices are the product of genes and we can't do a lot about it one way or another. I have my father's voice I think. To my ear, I sound very much like him. My brothers had tenor voices, but I inherited his baritone.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:03 pm (UTC)I had forgotten about Montgomery, thanks for the reminder to put him on the list. Plenty of material. If I have listeners, I'll keep at it.
Only so much fits in ten minutes. I want to keep the download size to 5 MB or so for other dialup users like myself. (Not to mention the fact that 3-4 hours of research and writing went into that 10 minute segment. Whew.)
Anyway, glad you liked it.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 11:44 am (UTC)You seem to get through each book thoroughly, but if I may offer some amount of constructive criticism, your past as a teacher shines through. A lot.
You sound detached, as if it's a memorized you're reciting for someone else to type down as you speak. I miss a sense of enthusiasm, of urge to share.
Also, and this is more a technical suggestion, I know from listening to 2's outtakes on his rants that it can be a good idea to cut things up at each natural stop, so if you don't get through a line properly, you can redo that instead of the whole cast. You may have done that, I don't know, but to my ears it sounded like you were choking on a couple of lines in there. May also be a difference in accents, of course.
But all in all, a pleasant listen, and I'm looking forward to the next one. I'll save my suggestions for books until we reach 'current' authors, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:10 pm (UTC)It was recorded in one run. Well, three takes, actually, but the last was used entire. After I figure out the features of Audacity better, I'll probably be able to do more cutting and pasting. I thought I was doing well to get the song excerpt inserted and the ID3 tags right.
First take was spoiled by the doorbell and dogs going off like atom bombs. Two young guys with a pickup full of hay. Nope, we didn't order any, in fact we just took delivery on 155 bales yesterday. But I'll bet you want the lady next door (the Brit with her rescue horse.)
Second take was OK but muffled sounding. I almost went with it until it dawned on me that Audacity was using the mic built into my monitor instead of the one on the headset. Duh. Worked that out and it was quite an improvement. Even I am reasonably satisfied with the way I sound. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:32 pm (UTC)Oh gods...you sound SO MUCH like a pro radio personality. :) A bit on the dry side, perhaps, but not so bad. A very intellectual recitation and discussion.
Intro music was good, btw. :)
Yay for Canadian authors! :D
*chuckle* Trust a librarian to be able to make an appropriate copyright and use statement at the end of his podcast...
---end thoughts---
A nice beginning. :) I have to admit to not being entirely fond of the hard, graphic tales mentioned. I've never read (or even heard of) Beautiful Joe, but it sounds much like the one I know best--Black Beauty.
Bambi I've only ever known through Disney, and that was bad enough. I had nightmares for weeks about fire after that, something that was to plague me on and off for many, many more long years in my childhood. The fear and terror really imprinted on my mind, and I still bear the mark, tempered now though it be with determination fueled by rage and cold, merciless calculation.
Even as a child's story, my heart was broken by Black Beauty, and even the "happy ending" was bittersweet, because of all that had come before. That happiness, to me, couldn't erase or even lessen the horrors and pain of the past.
Now I've grown up some. I'm better able to handle and control my emotions. But I still don't want to really read about such things unless I absolutely must. Especially if those were the "light" versions. Beauty I can at least sympathize with, as I now have a better understanding of how the ending could be truly a happy ending, lessening the pain which came before. But I still don't feel the need to subject myself to such great turmoil again.
I haven't watched Bambi more than three or four times in my whole life. Last time I watched, I decided that it had lost the impact it used to have, but I am also now at the point where because I am protecting myself from any potential weakness it might exploit, it has no meaning at all to me. The book would be different, but do I really need to be hit with more of that impact? I don't believe so. I haven't watched Black Beauty in years. Even knowing the ending, why should I push myself through the pain and sadness it brings? Interesting to note, though, that my favorite character in Black Beauty always was Ginger. She fought back against the oppression.
Okay, I'm going to go listen to something to brighten my mood now. :) Reflection on the darker parts of my former years leaves me in need of that. Ta-ra for now, then!
Oh...and as a tiny little suggestion, you may consider sounding actually interested in your material, rather than discussing it like a dry English prof who regards it as merely an object to be debated dispassionately, hmm? ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 12:49 pm (UTC)See above for remarks about the scholarly approach. Partly the rather elderly nature of the material, and partly my own need to distance myself from the highly emotional subjects.
My Mom read Black Beauty to my brother and me as a bedtime book. It was the original uncut, and she left nothing out. I guess she thought better of it when I started sobbing over Ginger's death, but she did finish the whole thing over a period of two or three weeks.
I had the same reaction to the Disney film version of Bambi that you did. In fact, my father carried me weeping from the theater in the middle of it. Never got as far as the fire. I only read the original much later in life, when I was in college. It wasn't the fire (which I didn't see that first time) but the murder of Bambi's mother by the hunters that I couldn't handle.
Beautiful Joe I never encountered until after meeting my mate, Gary. He had a permanent attachment to the book, and I read it at his urging. It is very well done, but I agree you might better avoid it if you have difficulty with the graphic violence. (I'm surprised to hear this from someone who plays video games much, though.)
I find the Mark Twain stories to be the most powerful of those I mentioned. I didn't read from them because I can't do it without getting choked up. And that's why this edition seems a bit dry. I had to be cool and scholarly or I couldn't read even those excerpts clearly. No one wants to listen to me breaking down and sobbing. ;P
Better things and much enthusiasm to come, I promise. Jack London, Kenneth Grahame, C. J. Cherryh, Mercedes Lackey, Anne McCaffrey, David Brin, John Varley, and more writers that I can talk about without breaking into tears.
Thanks for listening, wuffy. Seeya tonight, I trust.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:55 pm (UTC)And FYI, I don't play much video games. :) If I do play a game, it's generally a mission-oriented game (which helps me focus) and abstracted (I'm either destroying enemy ships, or I'm shooting enemies who will kill me if I don't kill them first, or I'm merely giving orders in a stretegic setting). I don't do freeform violence like the GTA series. That's just so not me.
Anne McCaffery...Dragonriders of Pern, yes? Love her. :D Also loved the book which handled dolphins... "Naw fish! Doll-fin!" *giggles*
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 04:09 am (UTC)Yes, the Dragonriders and Dolphins of Pern will be topics. Also Mercedes Lackey's Valdemar, where some humans are chosen by special telepathic horses to be their life partners in a manner similar to that of McCaffrey's Dragonriders.
Some less familiar but richly furry novels, like Stephen R. Boyett's The Architect of Sleep or C. J. Cherryh's Chanur series are definitely on my promotion list. Narnia, of course. And more importantly for me, Lewis' Out of the Silent Planet. Brian Jacques' Redwall series, and an old favorite of mine now forgotten by everyone, Flyball the space cat, will appear. I'd like to touch on native American myth and legend too.
Eventually I hope to reach a point of participatory discussion on just what it is about these anthopomorphic stories, whether text or animated film, that so fascinates some of us and so much repels others. Gary and I have a friend, a fine musician and experienced teacher of preschool kids, who absolutely cannot stand the "talking animal" genre, as he calls it. Disinterest I can understand, but his dislike puzzles me.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 07:11 pm (UTC)Out of the Silent Planet is by far my favorite Lewis book, because of the "old furry folk" of Malacandra, the sorns, the pfifltriggi, and most especially, the otter-like hrossa. The races that were unfallen, the like of whom would never come again because once Maleldil took human form on Earth, then forever after all rational beings would have to look like him. (The logic of that escapes me, but the sadness of it is all-encompassing once one has seen the nobility and artistry of the hrossa.) I do love Narnia with its talking animals, of course, and most especially the later books of that series, but the hrossa are among my very favorite characters in all of literature.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 06:43 pm (UTC)Yep, I'll post just like this when the next episode is ready. Or if you have an e-mail program that handles RSS feeds, you can subscribe via the XML link above and have the URL for each edition drop into your mailbox automatically.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 10:13 pm (UTC)I have a hard time reading about bad stuff happening to equines or cervines so I've only read a few bits of the real Bambi and that was enough to shut that book forever. I suppose it's a little odd that I draw the line there and then I can watch horror films and play the violent sort of video games without a hitch really. Yet for instance Braveheart or The Ring, I can never watch again.
Anyhow I hope I can talk to you soonish about the whole MFF thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 04:55 am (UTC)There are some psychological aspects in it I can't define, and while a certain scene on a ferry in the middle of it shouldn't have been there, the movie itself stands out as a re-definition of the horror genre.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 07:56 am (UTC)Jackson's LotR is often ugly. The imagery is just plain nasty and unpleasant, and he omitted much of the descriptive portion of Tolkien's story that would have been sheer beauty. But there is nothing there I could equate to "horror" and certainly nothing that seems as bizarre to me as Stephen King's imaginings. He turned the story into a Homeric epic. Like the Iliad, just a series of battles and counting coup, with a few idle love scenes tossed in and the hobbits as comic relief.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 09:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 10:21 am (UTC)I am serious here. I like scary movies. The worst I've ever had in the way of a reaction to one was looking over my shoulder when taking the dog for a walk in a dark forest afterwards.
After watching The Ring I would start sweating nervously if there was a black/white movie on TV (like the video tape) or if I got a static screen (which I won't explain since it's essential to the plot).
Winter is coming, and if you and Gary should want a movie that makes you cuddle up real close to feel safe, rent this one.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 04:16 am (UTC)Braveheart was long and boring, though I did manage to watch the whole thing. Rob Roy was a much better production in that vein, I think, though it was nearly as violent and the rape scene particularly repulsive. Peter Jackson's Ring trilogy simply missed the whole point of the books, in my opinion, as film makers are wont to do. I can watch it again for the elements that I think he got right, but much of it has little to do with the story that I believe Tolkien was telling.
Sure, grab me on Taps or e-mail me about MFF. Are you going to be able to go now that you have a new job?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 07:58 pm (UTC)I can't watch Braveheart because of how over the top the violence to horses is in it. With "The Ring", again horses are driven insane and kill themselves horribly because of the 'evil'. The movie itself was stupid and not scary to me, just played on cheap tricks and trying to make nonsense into fear.
As for the new Lord of the Rings movie. Well I really like it and I've read the books. Books are almost always going to be better than the films from them but some things simply cannot be made into the film version of a novel and sometimes you have to bend things to be a certain way in order to reach people that can't grasp the book form.
Yes I plan on going, I just hope this job allows me the funds to do so.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 10:21 pm (UTC)How often will you be doing these? (You might've said...)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 04:20 am (UTC)I'm quite honestly pleased with the favorable comments, but still curious to see whether I can develop a consistent audience that contributes questions and ideas. And thanks for listening.
Amazingly Wonderful
Date: 2005-10-17 08:51 am (UTC)sort of thing, forget podcasts, you should be on the radeeoh daddeeoh.
Secondly this is a really good subject for a 'cast. I've often joked
that my own furry wasn't brought on by Disney but by "19th Century
writers that decided animals could talk".
Along those lines I've attempted, in online roleplay, to try and either
give rational reasons for being anthropomorphic or to play such a
character less anthro and more morphic. That is, if I walk upright
and look like a human with paws and claws, why? If I do /not/ but
have language, then what would that language be like? I'm not sure
but wasn't it Shakespeare that asked, "If a lion spoke, would we
understand him?"
None the less I'm glad that you pointed out that none of the stories
19th century writers created were really intended for adults, though
as history moved on and we became, as people, more cynical and focused
on the machine as the industrial revolution touched everything in life.
Richard Adam's Watership Down is an modern example of such a work
because it has evidence of "animal violence" that isn't usually
in the sort of Disney canon we associate with talking animals.
Personally the work that most evoked the "playground of the mind"
(as Larry Niven puts it) was Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. Though,
and perhaps this would be best discussed (if at all, its your show
after all 'tivo ^.^ )later on, would be the way the internet has
both enhanced the idea of furry and maybe degraded it. Did furry
evolve to the next level with yiff or was that just a way to use
the genre as a mask for sexuality not otherwise expressible?
Given the choice I'd rather have furry roleplay around online then
not. I've been involved in some stunningly creative worlds and hopefully
injected some of my own.
Just the /idea/ of animals that talk, be they ones that walk upright
or not, is a concept that will probably never cease as long as /we/
walk upright and talk. Its a good thing because it helps us to have
some empathy for the world we inhabit.
Re: Amazingly Wonderful
Date: 2005-10-17 09:09 am (UTC)More will be forthcoming, judging by the generally positive reactions.
Mrs. Frisby will come along in time, along with The Rescuers. Both really were written for children though, and at first I'm looking at stuff written by adults for adults. I think Jack London is my next subject.
Now the larger question of what furry fandom is about and how so much of it degenerated into yiff is a little beyond the scope of my series. That's something I'm curious about, but don't pretend to understand. Literature, though, I have a little background for.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 02:23 pm (UTC)On technical side, that USB microphone gives surprisingly good sound. And of course, your voice is perfect for 'casts, very enjoyable to listen.
*subscribed*
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 05:41 pm (UTC)I confess I'm a little taken aback by all the comments on my voice. I hadn't thought of it as out of the ordinary, but I'm certainly glad that everyone seems to like it.