The meme is suddenly popular and that has overloaded them. It's a grid of adjectives and you select five or six that apply to the target individual in your opinion, and then give your name or identifier. It keeps track and plots four quadrants: adjectives that the person chose for themselves but no one else selected, adjectives that the person chose and others also chose, adjectives that others chose but the target individual did not, and adjectives that remain unselected. For each, the number of times it was selected and by whom can be revealed.
All the adjectives are complimentary, so there's not much risk of hurt feelings. So far four people have cast votes on mine and the results are indeed interesting. Try back again later, it will let you on eventually. After you vote, you get a chance to create a similar page for yourself and let others cast votes for your attributes.
I don't think it matters that all the adjectives are complimentary. Adjectives that remain unselected or underrepresented after a fair number have cast their votes are just as telling as negatives would be. You can turn those into negatives and assume they have been selected rather than omitted. :)
Of course you are right - not selected by enough peeps means you just do not qualify - but- it would still be good to have some tangable negatives out there, so that it wouldn't seem such a whitewash.
Folks are so au fait with diplomacy in place of real; symbolism in place of truth. We all play games.
A lot of them are synonymous which seems a bit irritating. "Intelligent" and "witty" for instance ..... what really is the difference between those adjectives? They seem nearly synonymous to me.
Those two are not synonyms to me at all. Without looking, the list includes "clever", "knowledgable", "intelligent", "wise", and "witty." They are related and more than one are often found together, but they can exist on their own too.
clever: quick at solving puzzles or finding solutions to problems, a raccoon trait if you will, and involves intuition and experiment
knowledgable: filled with facts, a capacious memory, a walking encyclopedia if you like, but could be an idiot savant as well
intelligent: this encompasses reasoning ability combined with cleverness, so it's the left-brain version of clever, which may be very rightbrained and intuitive
wise: having the ability to make good decisions or judgements based on the available information, which is often a combination of knowledgable and intelligent
witty: this actually implies a sense of humor, not just intelligence, though of the others defined here intelligence is an important factor in wit
All these are aspects of the active mind, but they go in different directions. By choosing one over the others you are specifying the character of an individual as you see them.
Well, I'm going to say that I selected "caring" instead of "loving," but I really do think they're almost synonymous. I also want to note that for "logical" and "patient," those are also attributes I would have selected eventually, just not as the foremost six.
*smiles and hugs back* Well, I wasn't justifying my answers. I just didn't want you thinking that some of those things still labelled "Facade" really were a facade, because not all of them are.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 07:26 am (UTC)Not so sure about how I come out though.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 11:28 am (UTC)You are confident, independent, knowledgable, loving, warm and witty.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 09:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 09:09 pm (UTC)The more unexpected autobiographical factoids you expose, the more enigmatic you seem. :p
no subject
Date: 2006-02-12 03:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 11:21 am (UTC)All the adjectives are complimentary, so there's not much risk of hurt feelings. So far four people have cast votes on mine and the results are indeed interesting. Try back again later, it will let you on eventually. After you vote, you get a chance to create a similar page for yourself and let others cast votes for your attributes.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 04:35 pm (UTC)I don't think it matters that all the adjectives are complimentary. Adjectives that remain unselected or underrepresented after a fair number have cast their votes are just as telling as negatives would be. You can turn those into negatives and assume they have been selected rather than omitted. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 04:50 pm (UTC)Folks are so au fait with diplomacy in place of real; symbolism in place of truth. We all play games.
S'nuff(Eliot)..."well met altivo"
no subject
Date: 2006-02-11 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-12 03:46 am (UTC)clever: quick at solving puzzles or finding solutions to problems, a raccoon trait if you will, and involves intuition and experiment
knowledgable: filled with facts, a capacious memory, a walking encyclopedia if you like, but could be an idiot savant as well
intelligent: this encompasses reasoning ability combined with cleverness, so it's the left-brain version of clever, which may be very rightbrained and intuitive
wise: having the ability to make good decisions or judgements based on the available information, which is often a combination of knowledgable and intelligent
witty: this actually implies a sense of humor, not just intelligence, though of the others defined here intelligence is an important factor in wit
All these are aspects of the active mind, but they go in different directions. By choosing one over the others you are specifying the character of an individual as you see them.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 01:42 pm (UTC)You don't have to justify your choices. Thanks for voting.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 09:20 pm (UTC)