Well, OK, I'll do this one, though I'm not quite clear on what it means by "close".
I tried out TrustFlow II for LiveJournal. The following people not on the friends list for
altivo are close by:
I tried out TrustFlow II for LiveJournal. The following people not on the friends list for
volatilis_equus (350 - 400)
canid_anubis (400 - 450)
shinigamigirl (450 - 500)
blackwingdragon (500 - 550)
evoquus,
wortblossom,
confusedbrit (550 - 600)
toob,
auryanne,
flaredragon,
paws_and_claws,
vetiver_zizan (600 - 650)
unclekage,
werellama,
perro,
insaneappy,
terminotaur (650 - 700)
deaconcolt,
bladehorse,
preyfar,
foxxfire,
shadowolf,
jovanthepaladin,
xolo,
ponytrap,
rcking,
auroraaliuna,
kakoukorakos,
shockwave77598 (700 - 750)
bucky_boy,
hartree (750 - 800)
mirkowuff,
bloodwolves,
2_gryphon,
robynz,
eaglemascot,
t_h_squirrel,
quasiskunk,
drakeblazefire,
vtaarahn,
pouchhopper,
mithent (800 - 850)
agroantirrhopus,
spikedpunch,
butterscotchvix,
expandranon,
cuprohastes,
grevydude,
pandaguy,
foxymoonheart (850 - 900)
xanthusequine,
xianjaguar,
thedarkdruid,
tremaine,
sorayume,
sage_deer,
lc1984,
triggur,
n,
auradeva,
justincheetah,
balloonpup (900 - 950)
kinkyturtle,
snow_kitty,
hydra_velsen,
strider_orion,
rustitobuck,
nightfurson,
furrycow,
happypup (950 - 1000)
hoof_stables,
normanrafferty,
screwball420,
cuttercoon,
delphinios,
simbamco,
harlequeen,
shy_matsi (1000 - 1050)
vandringar,
dragonrift,
cargoweasel,
bluedeer,
zfl101,
skippythewonder,
mavikfelna,
hastka,
pegasus316,
jalen_dragon,
the_gneech,
damoncanine,
mortonfox,
xylen,
balloonfox,
darklilith69,
takaza,
swandog,
akerin (1050 - 1100)
posicat,
quietfire_ (1100 - 1150)
Created by ciphergoth; hosted by LShift.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 03:35 am (UTC)He reminds me of you, because he's an "elder" and he's also pretty intelligent and respected. (at least, as far as i can tell.)
Yeah, and i don't get how this thing figures 'closeness' either. There are some strange picks near the top of mine.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:15 am (UTC)So like.. a bunch of your friends have person X and you don't, so he's 'closest' to your friends list. :P
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:20 am (UTC)Most of the time I add folks either because they have been commenting in my entries, indicating that they are actually reading my journal, or because I notice that they've added me and looked at their own journal and found it interesting.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 05:07 am (UTC)I've also tried to keep my friend-list as short as reasonably possible, and almost all the real people on it are folks I've met in person. I ran my nick through TrustFlow a few days back, but initially put the results in a private entry. It's now public.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 07:26 am (UTC)Juicy Trust Juice
Date: 2006-03-30 09:18 am (UTC)1) people that you might want to consider adding to your friends list
2) people that you already know about that you've already decided that you don't want to add to your friends list
Some seem to have a lot of the latter picked by this program, and it makes them wonder. ;-)
Re: Juicy Trust Juice
Date: 2006-03-30 10:16 am (UTC)Another way of looking at this thing, I think, is as the reverse of that meme that lists the largest cliques you belong to.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 10:05 am (UTC)So: something ventured, something gained :) What value it has is yet to be determined, but it was something, at least.
Light and laughter,
SongCoyote
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 12:44 pm (UTC)I did notice you had a couple of exceedingly low scores there. I went through a period of actively collecting such folks, so I didn't come up with any that "close" who weren't already friended by me.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 03:26 pm (UTC)Don't mind the above; it's mostly a holdover from my Jr. and High School days, where "clique" meant a rather unpleasant exclusivity into which I was never really invited (though in retrospect I can't say I'm too sorry).
I still need to go through the lower scores and see who (if any) I should friend. I don't want to overwhelm myself with stuff to read, though, so I've taken a rather procrastinatory attititude towards doing it :) I often end up reading at least some of their entries anyway based on their comments in my journal and some of my friends'.
Huh - LiveJournal really does form and/or reflect communities!
Light and laughter,
SongCoyote
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:14 pm (UTC)Merely the purely clinical meaning of the term: groups of mutual friends. You've seen that clique-counting meme, surely? It analyzes your f-list against those of all your friends, and finds the largest group(s) of which you are a member in which every member is friended to every other member.
My hypothesis is that if we were to run that meme, then add a couple of the "closest" from this meme and run the clique meme again (refreshing its buffer of course) it would find new, larger groups that would include the newly-added friends.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:22 pm (UTC)I haven't heard of the clique meme, though I'm sure a before and after would be interesting, particularly with the short-"distance" friends this particular meme uncovered.
Interesting how LiveJournal is doing a lot of community things, even inadvertently. It has certainly expanded my horizons - I have a horsey friend in the Midwest now! :D
Light and laughter,
SongCoyote
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 04:30 pm (UTC)