Dubious elections
Nov. 7th, 2006 07:09 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's time to call in the UN to supervise US elections. Obviously the country that is trying to push democracy in the rest of the world is headed toward utter failure in the same department.
I just got back from the polling place. Some of you have seen me pointing out in the last couple of years that Diebold is NOT the only choice for counting votes, and that many areas, including my own, use other methods. I was not happy at all to see a Diebold touch screen on prominent display in the precinct. Apparently it is there "on trial" and people could use it if they chose to do so. To my utter disbelief, people were actually asking to use it.
Amusingly enough, it was not working properly at all, if there is any "proper" to those things. Refusing to record votes, refusing to recognize voters, etc. Frankly, I believe they are totally buggy and crooked.
I cast my vote the usual way. We mark a paper ballot designed for optical scanning. It is scanned on the spot and saved, so there is a paper trail and a valid recount can be conducted without "hanging chads" or lack of formal record.
When confronted with the actual candidate names, I voted for more Greens than I thought I would. Two Dems, one Republican, and the rest Green. All the county offices were Republicans running unopposed, none of them, especially not the county clerk, got my vote. And I voted to throw out all the incumbent judges. I'm getting angry. It's time to storm some political offices, drag the fat incumbents out by their greasy neckties, and string them up.
I just got back from the polling place. Some of you have seen me pointing out in the last couple of years that Diebold is NOT the only choice for counting votes, and that many areas, including my own, use other methods. I was not happy at all to see a Diebold touch screen on prominent display in the precinct. Apparently it is there "on trial" and people could use it if they chose to do so. To my utter disbelief, people were actually asking to use it.
Amusingly enough, it was not working properly at all, if there is any "proper" to those things. Refusing to record votes, refusing to recognize voters, etc. Frankly, I believe they are totally buggy and crooked.
I cast my vote the usual way. We mark a paper ballot designed for optical scanning. It is scanned on the spot and saved, so there is a paper trail and a valid recount can be conducted without "hanging chads" or lack of formal record.
When confronted with the actual candidate names, I voted for more Greens than I thought I would. Two Dems, one Republican, and the rest Green. All the county offices were Republicans running unopposed, none of them, especially not the county clerk, got my vote. And I voted to throw out all the incumbent judges. I'm getting angry. It's time to storm some political offices, drag the fat incumbents out by their greasy neckties, and string them up.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 02:13 pm (UTC)It'll be interesting to see what happens in our own local elections in May next year. My money is on a bloody nose for the ruling Labour party.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 02:15 pm (UTC)And yes the Diebold machines are scary. Trust me weather its an ATM, a slot machine or a voting machine. It can be rigged. Its all code.
Fortunatly here we still have the paper ballots that are taken at the schoolhouse by a little old lady who useto be a teacher there and puts em in a locked box so they can be counted.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:13 pm (UTC)Please vote the bar-steward out
Date: 2006-11-07 02:36 pm (UTC)Re: Please vote the bar-steward out
Date: 2006-11-07 07:16 pm (UTC)Re: Please vote the bar-steward out
Date: 2006-11-07 09:09 pm (UTC)Re: Please vote the bar-steward out
Date: 2006-11-07 09:25 pm (UTC)Re: Please vote the bar-steward out
Date: 2006-11-08 08:27 am (UTC)Dare one ask if the breakdown could be linked to the fact they were losing at the time?
Re: Please vote the bar-steward out
Date: 2006-11-08 11:32 am (UTC)Overall, the results are hopeful. At least the administration is no longer assured of clear sailing regardless of what it tries to do. They are key points on which I'm still extremely disappointed. Dennis Hastert was returned to the House, though he will no longer be Speaker. He should have been tossed out after his role in the Foley scandal. Some of the worst characters in the Senate were also re-elected.
Anti gay referenda were passed in as many as ten states, and that is really nasty news. I believe the courts will eventually invalidate them all, but it will take years.
The religious right appears to have parted company with the Republicans, and that is more or less good news. It slices away a good chunk of the monolithic control Bush has had over the country.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 03:19 pm (UTC)But in the meantime, I'll deal with the hassle of having to walk to my polling place and scratch marks like a caveman. *grinz*
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 03:22 pm (UTC)I think the US administration would have to request UN monitors. They couldn't just be "sent in"...
Astonishingly, there were international observers, not from UN but from OSCE, at the 2002 and 2004 US elections, and there supposedly will be one this election too. But it is a very small team (16 members), so I don't know how much they can do.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/08/international.observers/
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7005430704
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 04:44 pm (UTC)Actually, having observers from the local parties is more common. I think the majority of polling locations have those. And they'll be more whiny about percieved violations anyway.
Here is a post from 2004.
http://cortezopossum.livejournal.com/143705.html
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 05:58 pm (UTC)All the judges in my area were running unopposed (except for one, now that I think of it). The ballot would say "Vote for not more than three" and only three names were shown, along with a couple of blanks for write-ins. I have no beef with the judiciary here, so I didn't care. It's very difficult to run against incumbent judges here; it's a cozy little club and you have to get appointed first before you have a shot at election.
If I had the power to destroy corporations, Diebold would be first on my list. *spit*
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:07 pm (UTC)As I said in yesterday's post, no one is willing to run against these old guard republicans even in local races. They won't campaign on issues. Instead they start looking for muck, invent it if they have to, and shout their opponents down with loud advertising. They always seem to have all the money they want for television ads and scare tactics, while any Dem or Independent candidate would practically have to fund their own campaign out of pocket.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 06:50 pm (UTC)http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d72/AtomicNixon/Vole01.jpg
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:20 pm (UTC)They had some electronic thing at the front. It was empty and had no sign. Not sure if that was the Diebold or not.
People who push those things need to read more on them.
http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/evoting.ars
Too many positions lacked a third choice here.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 07:30 pm (UTC)This earns you One Role Play Of Your Choice.
^.^
O RLY?
Date: 2006-11-07 07:58 pm (UTC)You sure you want to get into that? ;p
no subject
Date: 2006-11-08 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-08 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-08 03:04 am (UTC)An amazing man, though people may not agree with his methods....I didn't know he had Asthma.
*sings from a Travis song "Last train"*
"On her jacket, there's a picture in white of Che Guevara, as he sits beneath a tree, that's not important but he looked a bit like me..."