Officious and irritating bureaucrats
Jan. 12th, 2007 07:13 pmWednesday I put some printed documents into a padded envelope, addressed it to
corelog (who lives in Canada), weighed it, looked up the correct postage, affixed the appropriate stamps, and put it in my mailbox. The letter carrier took it away.
Today it came back with a blank customs form taped to it and a snippy note telling me I must fill out a customs declaration. So I filled out the stupid declaration, marking it "No value, printed documents." But I thought to myself, "I shouldn't be doing this." So I went to the USPS web site and looked up the rule.
I'm right. First class mail or air mail, under 16 ounces, with no dutiable contents: NO FORM REQUIRED. Now I'm hopping mad. They delayed my outbound mail by four days for no good reason at all. If I haven't cooled off by tomorrow morning, I'm going to the post office to have a hissy fit. I have sent similar mail to Canada before, and never needed a declaration. It has always been delivered. A box or something over a pound, yes, I understand the requirement and I fill out the dumb form.
Today it came back with a blank customs form taped to it and a snippy note telling me I must fill out a customs declaration. So I filled out the stupid declaration, marking it "No value, printed documents." But I thought to myself, "I shouldn't be doing this." So I went to the USPS web site and looked up the rule.
I'm right. First class mail or air mail, under 16 ounces, with no dutiable contents: NO FORM REQUIRED. Now I'm hopping mad. They delayed my outbound mail by four days for no good reason at all. If I haven't cooled off by tomorrow morning, I'm going to the post office to have a hissy fit. I have sent similar mail to Canada before, and never needed a declaration. It has always been delivered. A box or something over a pound, yes, I understand the requirement and I fill out the dumb form.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 04:03 am (UTC)How do you want me to know what kind of fabrics, where it was made and how much it is worth if the label is not on the **** T-shirt anymore. What is a big fuss about sending a very used T-shirt in USA, it won't kill anyone nor will it bring down the economy, especially when the owner is an american citizen.
But such is the complexity of free trade nowadays ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 07:00 am (UTC)My problem though, is not with Canadian customs, who already let similar envelopes through recently. This is the local post office not knowing its own rules. The letter never got as far as customs.
You should label old t-shirts as "rags for paper making" or something like that. ;p
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 04:10 am (UTC)calls are in order.
Thats bullshit man.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:03 pm (UTC)It was about that time when news stories started appearing about flagrant problems in the Chicago post office. Truckloads of mail that had been "stashed" rather than delivered. Sacks of mail dumped in the river or under tollway overpasses, or piled in alleys and set alight.
Terry Pratchett's book Going Postal has nothing on the Chicago post office, I'm afraid.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:14 pm (UTC)You boys stay safe this weekend, it is turning out to be an ugly weekend here. Malamute walking at 5:30AM is no fun at all when it is rainy and 32 degrees out. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 12:40 pm (UTC)Why do I have a feeling that I've had this discussion with someone before o.O
Well just don't make it personal with the person behind the counter, they suffer enough since any complaint with the system ends up heaped on them.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-13 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 03:20 am (UTC)