Blog-snooping corporations
Jan. 16th, 2007 07:52 pmA colleague at another library in our group posted some negative remarks to a personal blog, one that has no obvious connection with employer or personal name. The blogger mentioned the vendor we dislike, SirsiDynix, by name, but leetified the name to S!rs!Dyn!x and one of the obnoxious software products to W0rkFl0ws. The remarks were more directed against the management of the Big Messed-Up Consortium and their air-headed trainers than at the vendor itself.
However, within an hour or so a snippy e-mail reply was received from the vendor, implying that the blogger wasn't paying attention or was evidently too dumb to understand the product and should ask for help.
I maintain that this was entirely inappropriate on the part of the vendor. First of all, snooping around on the web like that suggests that they were looking for people to sue for saying negative stuff about them and/or looking for their own employees saying negative stuff so they could punish them. That's despicable in my opinion.
Secondly, although the blog in question is publicly readable, it does not invite comments from strangers particularly, and certainly not that sort of comment. At best, the vendor rep should have asked questions in order to better understand the situation before spouting off glib answers. This is a company that won't let you see the product documentation before you sign a contract. To me, that ought to queer any deal right out of existence.
Snowstorm aftermath in full swing here. The following high pressure center has arrived, the sky is clear, and the temperature is dropping like a stone. Down to 8°F. already, headed for -3°F. tonight they say.
Now I'm going to shut everything off to install a KVM switch so that I don't need extra keyboards and mice floating around my desk. If it works, I may be back.
Edit: It does work, though the PS/2 mouse I switched back to obviously needs cleaning.
However, within an hour or so a snippy e-mail reply was received from the vendor, implying that the blogger wasn't paying attention or was evidently too dumb to understand the product and should ask for help.
I maintain that this was entirely inappropriate on the part of the vendor. First of all, snooping around on the web like that suggests that they were looking for people to sue for saying negative stuff about them and/or looking for their own employees saying negative stuff so they could punish them. That's despicable in my opinion.
Secondly, although the blog in question is publicly readable, it does not invite comments from strangers particularly, and certainly not that sort of comment. At best, the vendor rep should have asked questions in order to better understand the situation before spouting off glib answers. This is a company that won't let you see the product documentation before you sign a contract. To me, that ought to queer any deal right out of existence.
Snowstorm aftermath in full swing here. The following high pressure center has arrived, the sky is clear, and the temperature is dropping like a stone. Down to 8°F. already, headed for -3°F. tonight they say.
Now I'm going to shut everything off to install a KVM switch so that I don't need extra keyboards and mice floating around my desk. If it works, I may be back.
Edit: It does work, though the PS/2 mouse I switched back to obviously needs cleaning.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 02:13 am (UTC)I do that, but my mouse is not fully functional unless plugged into the USB port. So I still have 2 mice.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 02:36 am (UTC)This is a company that won't let you see the product documentation before you sign a contract.
Oh, the corporate version of "Just trust me" and a pig in a poke. See icon for proper treatment of such. PR flacks seem not to get it: Good PR is built by having a product you aren't ashamed of. Harassing people who have to deal with your product and aren't happy about it makes (more) bad PR. Has SirsiDynix reached the point of qualifying itself for Chilling Effects?
--
I am amused by what the LJ spellchecker suggests when it encounters SirsiDynix, which is of course not in the LJ spellchecker's dictionary. First suggested replacement: Stinks.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 03:11 am (UTC)SirsiDynix is actually a reasonably acceptable product for what it is. The trouble is, my particular group of a dozen or so libraries was accustomed to something better: Innovative Millennium, which is a Cadillac compared to Sirsi's Chevy Metro. So we're not happy about being told (lied to, as it turns out) that we had to switch to this less capable product and we're not happy with the high-handed attitude of the Big Messed-Up Consortium administrators, who are after all actually employees of the member libraries collectively. After Thursday we'll know for sure whether our little subgroup actually has a viable escape route. Hooves crossed here.
SirsiDynix, already a result of mergers of several failing software houses, was in financial difficulties and sold itself to a holding corporation in November of last year. I don't think it a very good idea to become dependent on their products, especially since their development schedule is falling behind now.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 02:17 am (UTC)And Metro as in, efficient, nimble, versatile, reliable and cost effective?
I guess not XD
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 04:28 am (UTC)Ok, so Millennium is an Arabian war horse and WorkFlows is more of a burro. The first is elegant, fast, and gets you where or what you want more easily. The second will do the job, but is slow, reluctant, and clumsy about it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 04:48 am (UTC)See the horsie analogy is far better :)
Although aren't Arabian war horses tempremental, more likely to trample you and will blindly follow a rider to death?
But the Burro is clever, better behaved and does much more than appears it could? After all the mule is the choice for pack animal :) Except in the desert then it's the camel :)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 05:05 am (UTC)And in a piece of software, I want something that does what I tell it to do, rather than saying "I can't do that, Dave" the way a burro is likely to put it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 06:12 am (UTC)Sorry Pony I'm just feeling evil today.
*gives you some Oaty treats*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 05:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 02:45 pm (UTC)As for the KVM, I run dual monitors and have yet to find a good dual monitor KVM. They make KVMs for 5 towers to 1 monitor but don't readily offer dual or more monitors for multiple towers.. And I was planning on a third monitor! Bleh. I work from home and at times have 10-12 open programs that all want to take up the spotlight. Dual has been useful although my companies VPN/ VPS does not know how to deal with the screen resolution of what it thinks is a super wide single monitor..
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 07:38 pm (UTC)Cat.
Date: 2007-01-17 06:03 pm (UTC)To clarify a bit, now that I've checked my sitemeter: apparently Software Vendor Guy has me in his RSS feeds. I'm not sure whether to be horrified or, well, gratified? Mostly, I'm gratified. And even more, amused. Welcome to my rather chaotic life, Mr. SirsiDynix Dude! All comments are appreciated, glad to be noticed, but you've had your turn now, so sit down like a good Canadian.
By the way, though I've got you RSS'd now, I found this post via Google's Blogsearch. ;-)
Re: Cat.
Date: 2007-01-17 07:16 pm (UTC)On the other hand, it isn't essential. I unscreen stuff as soon as I find it, and I rarely post anything locked against the public or anonymous viewer.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 10:43 pm (UTC)I remember some VW dealer tried to sue someone for what they said on a forum, unfortunately for them he had documented every single interaction and problem he'd had with the dealer and successfully counter sued for a refund on his car and expenses. Ahhh I love that sort of thing.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 03:47 am (UTC)hope they is 'k.
As for blogs.
I'm /still/ trying to deal with the hip word.
A Web Log is an /online/ log. As opposed to
what you do in Notepad, or even better, with
a pen and a beer sitting under the living
room light.
I tend to think that everything I put online, even
if I make it "private" is saved somewhere and
eyed, either by the government (maybe) or some
hack from the corps (prolly).
Its still wrong. I think you should complain
about the invasion of privacy. Better yet,
complain on your blog. ^.^
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 04:41 am (UTC)Friends put up a fence at the front of the house which looks horrible and when asked why they said "We don't like people looking in"
My answer "You really think people want to?"
But as you say it is kind of funny how those who kick up a fuss about privacy and yet put all their personal details on blogs for everyone to see XD
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 05:27 am (UTC)of course, thats /implied/ and should
be taken with a few pounds of salt.
As for me, I have nothing to hide, I...just...
don't...give...a...damn.
In the mid 90s I had this small argument
on Usenet with this guy that was yelling
about how "The government is taking over
the internet!"
Well duh! The government, DARPA to be
exact, /invented/ the internet!
Privacy is in the eye of the beholder, and
while it blows that there are abuses such
as the pony pointed out, we need to get
away from the idea that your anonymous
on the internet. Every keystroke you've
ever made into this system...is recorded
somewhere.
Probably Google and they will sell it to
Homeland Security and chant "Do no evil"
XD
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 11:31 am (UTC)This has already happened.