Minor Landmark
Mar. 23rd, 2007 04:53 pmWhee! I just took the last Windows 98 machine out of service at the library. Unfortunately, because the machine in that rarely used location does get used by someone addicted to Microsoft Publisher, it was replaced with Windows XP on a slightly faster machine. The retired unit was also the last Gateway PC we had in operation, other than three provided by the Gates Foundation under partial grants. Those must remain in service with Windows installed until either five years have elapsed or the hardware fails. In one case, I suspect the hard drive is going to die before the five years are up.
Now if I could only assassinate Windows ME. It only resides on a single machine, a flaky Dell laptop. At this point it's a tossup whether the laptop itself will die or ME will fail miserably... Oh, I should take that back. Windows ME also runs our heating and cooling system. It's often hard to tell whether environment control problems are due to ME or to the crappy system it controls. But I can't touch that, it's outside my domain.
Counting...
Present tally:
Windows ME = 1 (plus the dedicated machine that controls the HVAC)
Windows 2000 = 4
Windows 2000 Server = 2
Windows XP Pro = 8
Slackware Linux v. 10.2= 3
RedHat Linux v. 7.0 = 1 proxy server
Fedora Core "Linux" = 11 single user machines, 1 multiuser machine with 5 X terminals
Unspecified Linux version = 1 WatchGuard firewall box
Some of you know I am decidedly not a fan of RedHat/Fedora. I inherited the proxy server, and as long as it keeps working I'm not messing with it. The Fedora installations are part of a third party management package that runs on nearly all our public access machines. Being Linux based, it runs with very few problems and costs us far less than the same number of machines with Windows on them did, so I'll settle for that.
Now if I could only assassinate Windows ME. It only resides on a single machine, a flaky Dell laptop. At this point it's a tossup whether the laptop itself will die or ME will fail miserably... Oh, I should take that back. Windows ME also runs our heating and cooling system. It's often hard to tell whether environment control problems are due to ME or to the crappy system it controls. But I can't touch that, it's outside my domain.
Counting...
Present tally:
Windows ME = 1 (plus the dedicated machine that controls the HVAC)
Windows 2000 = 4
Windows 2000 Server = 2
Windows XP Pro = 8
Slackware Linux v. 10.2= 3
RedHat Linux v. 7.0 = 1 proxy server
Fedora Core "Linux" = 11 single user machines, 1 multiuser machine with 5 X terminals
Unspecified Linux version = 1 WatchGuard firewall box
Some of you know I am decidedly not a fan of RedHat/Fedora. I inherited the proxy server, and as long as it keeps working I'm not messing with it. The Fedora installations are part of a third party management package that runs on nearly all our public access machines. Being Linux based, it runs with very few problems and costs us far less than the same number of machines with Windows on them did, so I'll settle for that.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-23 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 01:56 am (UTC)I was sorta hoping they went to low
income schools or such.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 02:14 am (UTC)In any case, we are low income ourselves. By the time I give up on finding any use for a machine, it won't run any current software fast enough for anyone to sit still for it. Kids who already have ADD or literacy issues aren't going to sit for long to use an older, slower machine.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 01:38 am (UTC)The four and five year old Dell P3 boxes I recycle to a new less demanding task, like as a public catalog terminal (only has to run a web browser ever) or proxy or print server. We have quite a few of them (about 20 originally) that are identical so I can also use one or two to cannibalize for parts to keep the others going. All our catalog terminals run on those.
This sort of thing horrifies the tech consultant types of course. They want us to replace every computer we own on a three year cycle. I don't have that kind of budget and never will, so it isn't gonna happen. Fortunately, those P3 machines run Linux pretty well, even though they crawl with XP.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 12:27 am (UTC)Win2K= :0)
WinXP Pro= :0) :0)
Linux = I'll let you know if I can ever get it to work (actually, I have, but it never fails to diss some piece of hardware that I have).
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 01:43 am (UTC)If it's odd hardware that gives you trouble with Linux, have you tried some flavor of RedHat? I dislike them a lot, but they have more native drivers available than any other distribution as far as I can tell. That or someone will know how to make it work.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 02:07 am (UTC)I wasn't into computers when Windows 2.0 was out..the first one I used was Windows 3.1..but I can certainly believe 2.0 and 2.1 were buggy as all get-out.
I don't really know what's going to happen with Vista. It usually takes me two or three years to upgrade my OS, and right now I'm really happy with XP Pro. I'll probably try it at some point, but it won't be for awhile.
I think Microsoft is a victim of its own success. I can hear all the Apple junkies cringing, but what I mean is that there has to be a reason for people to switch. But how do you motivate people to switch without alienating the people that are already running your other products? As a computer-weenie, I might upgrade to Vista out of curiosity, but I know a lot of workplaces that are still running Windows 2000..because it does everything they want it to do, so why change? I can't convince my boss to spend the money for a copy of Vista because I really can't come up with any good reason.
And of course, there's the whole "better wait until the first SP comes out"...plus the increased hardware requirements...et. al.
Trying to get my boss to buy a new computer is like selling ice cubes to Eskimos, although we're finally getting rid of the last of the real dogs (however, there's still a Celeron 400 that I'm trying to get rid of). I imagine it's probably that way in many situations. "Well, I'd like to run this new OS..it's a bit buggy still, and BTW, it requires $750 worth of new hardware." Not a very convincing argument to one's boss!
Time will tell.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 02:46 am (UTC)But I don't think ME is Microsnot's biggest failure. It comes close, but I think BOB still outdoes it. ME runs ok once you subdue it. For the most part anyway. I'll still be glad to get rid of it.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 11:29 am (UTC)As for indoor snow, yes, that is very nearly what we sometimes get. Last week we had an event in our meeting room that was way overattended. That room is a separate "zone" on the system precisely because it is often empty but sometimes heavily occupied, and should in theory be able to compensate for that. The outdoor temperature at the time was about 50°F and the temperature inside the room was 78°F and rising when someone complained to me about it. So I went to the mechanical room to check on the thing. As usual, Windows ME thought it was 3 am instead of 7:30 pm (for some reason the clock on ME never keeps good time when running for any extended period) and worse, was pumping additional heat into the space. The hot water coils were open and the fans running full blast. The air being blown into the room was at 85°F, the relief fans were off, and the situation was being totally ignored even though the desired temperature was set to 72 which is supposed to keep it in the range of 69 to 75. I had to manually disable the heat, and use a supervisor command to force the system to bring outside air into the room. It does this kind of thing all the time, yet the HVAC folks keep telling us it is performing "as expected."
no subject
Date: 2007-03-25 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-25 01:41 am (UTC)Architects. I swear, they are only interested in appearances and never in practicality.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-24 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-25 01:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-25 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-25 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 12:36 am (UTC)The same apps work flawlessly on XP, Win2K, Win98, and Linux. Only ME has this problem with them.