After a quick stop by the guild meeting to drop off show entries (three handspun skeins for my boss, who couldn't attend due to a funeral, and eight for myself) we dashed down to Sycamore, Illinois for the 51st Steam Threshing Bee. We met
quickcasey there by prearrangement, and proceeded to tour the stationary engines, steam tractors, conventional Diesel and gasoline engine tractors, hit-or-miss engines, and flea markets, as well as watching the parade of equipment, enjoying a thresher's luncheon (grilled chicken and pork chops, baked beans, cole slaw, cottage cheese, applesauce, bread and butter, and cold beverages) and [mostly] resisting the urge to buy toys and junk.
 |
Altivo and Quickcasey
At the Steam Threshing Bee, posed with a Minneapolis-Moline that was being raffled by the Future Farmers. Note carved walking sticks we purchased in the flea market. Mine has a horse head, while Casey's has a wolf. Casey and Gary each bought a ticket on the tractor, though neither has any particular idea what he'd do with it if he won. |
 |
Illinois Thresher Co. steam tractor
Made in Sycamore, Illinois, this one got the honor of being the first steamer in the afternoon parade. There were a huge number of steam threshers by different makers in the show, and my limited bandwidth only allows me to show you a couple of them. |
 |
Port Huron Engine Co. steam tractor
These were made in Port Huron, Michigan and featured a dual cylinder that made use of the steam twice, if I understand the design correctly. Most of the steamers in the show were very well-restored and painted. They made smoke, but were amazingly quiet compared to the Diesel and gasoline engine tractors. Also, much of the mechanism is on the outside and visible, so you see valve sliders, cams, and governors in operation as they go by. |
 |
Porsche gasoline tractor
Did you know that Porsche once made tractors? I didn't. There were two at the show, both carefully restored like the one pictured here. Note the streamlined styling of the engine cover, unlike anything else of its era (the 1940s I believe.) |
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-13 10:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 04:56 am (UTC): D
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 11:39 am (UTC)I agree. Steam power is underrated and probably more ecologically safe than today's popular means. Trouble is, it won't mesh with today's impatient people. You can't just turn a key and stomp on the gas. You also have to be a little more aware of safety: not just avoiding collisions, but preventing steam explosions.
They had a real steam shovel, restored to working condition though we didn't get to see it operating, and a sawmill run by a couple of the tractors using long leather belts. What I found most interesting though was a large stationary engine built by Vilter. It must have been made to run compressors for refrigeration, because it had a couple of disconnected gauges for ammonia pressure. It was up and running, beautifully clean and powerful, and almost silent. What a contrast with today's bang and clatter of noise that seems to impress people so much.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 12:00 pm (UTC)http://www.samedeutz-fahr.com/lamborghini/
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 02:08 pm (UTC)We've looked briefly at the smaller offerings from New Holland and Kubota, but the prices are too much for us. We did buy a White garden tractor about three years ago, but ended up returning it because it was so poorly designed and built. The entire experience was so unpleasant that we've resisted looking any further. Cub Cadet is the same maker as White now, I believe (MTD) and that leaves only John Deere. New ones are really expensive unless you just want a lawn mower you can ride on. We'd like something that can pull a small chain harrow, rake, or aerator without voiding the warranty. It seems the choices are a new John Deere in the $5K to $10K range (ouch) or find something older that we can keep running without too much difficulty.
5-10K??
Date: 2007-08-12 05:52 pm (UTC)If ya know how to wrench alittle, look into getting a used tractor. Knowing you as much as I do, I think youd get allong with a fordson. Dual fuel and very simple to maintain. Start on gas, and run on 1/2 price kerosene. The fordsons typically run 3-4k out here beat to death:p
Yup Cali sucks like that.
Re: 5-10K??
Date: 2007-08-12 06:31 pm (UTC)When I said $5 to $10K, I was talking about the "garden tractors" from John Deere. Those are little guys, but with gear and shaft drive instead of rubber belt drives like the lawnmowers have. They are rated to pull a harrow or disc, and some have hydraulics for a small front end bucket that can be good for snow or light stuff (like dry sheep manure, of which we presently have a large pile that needs moving.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 05:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 11:44 am (UTC)Other than the fact that all the infernal combustion machines were much noisier, I wasn't paying attention to the distinctions between them. I was more impressed by how quiet the steam engines were. The tractors don't exhaust steam through the stack to draw more air through the firebox and increase efficiency the way railroad locomotives do, so they don't have that firebreathing dragon quality about them. Instead they just make quiet chuffs and hisses, and sometimes a little clatter as the metal wheels roll over the ground or the steering is actuated (usually it has chains in it.)
On the other hand, many of them had steam whistles and some of the operators seemed to love tooting at each other. At noon the whistle on the stationary engine was sounded and all the others joined in, like howling wolves. You had to cover your ears, and they kept it up for much too long in my opinion. ;p
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 06:02 pm (UTC)I really wish I could afford to get one of thosee and restore it. Their a blast(hopefully figuratevely only) to run :p
no subject
Date: 2007-08-12 06:48 pm (UTC)Yup the port Hurons are a compound engine
Date: 2007-08-12 06:30 am (UTC)I do miss not going to the old Threshers Reunion in Iowa.Soo many things to see and wish I had the time and money to tinker with:p
Re: Yup the port Hurons are a compound engine
Date: 2007-08-12 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-13 10:31 am (UTC)Love the Porsche tractor, all this talk of tractors reminds me there's a turbo Daihatsu charade around here that has John Deere Valves in it ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-13 11:01 am (UTC)The suspenders were almost an accident. I started out to put on other clothes because of the heat, but changed my mind midstream.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-13 11:08 am (UTC)