Not much color yet, but dry, cool, with skies of intense blue punctuated with streaks and blobs of white cloud. Tess was glad to go out, reluctant to come back in. There are mosquitoes again, though. We had reached a point where they were almost extinct, and then a few drippy days a couple of weeks ago were enough to bring them back, persistent little demons that they are.
Gasoline prices keep dropping. I paid $2.42 this afternoon, which is the lowest in months though certainly not the lowest in the last year. We bottomed out at $1.45 last December, which must have been the lowest price around here in several years. Farther back than any records I have, at least.
Days keep ticking off too without my getting the work finished that must be done in the next couple of weeks in order to make it into the Fiber shows in October.
Garden lettuce is all gone, or nearly so, but the hot frame yielded mustard greens, arugula, and cilantro for a salad tonight, and added lettuce from the supermarket. It was tasty.
Time to think about NaNoWriMo. Since I will not be interrupting November to attend MFF this year, I should be able to exceed the 50K word quota if I plan my time correctly. The question is, do I return to Argos and Fennec, or perhaps to Jake and Chrysios? I've had a couple of people urging me to revisit Menander even, but I'm not sure he ever attracted a lot of interest. There's at least one side story to Argos and Fennec, as well, and that would be Inspector Hammel's story explaining where he was before he came to Westvale, and how he first met Fennec. It's a good story, but I'm not sure it's large enough for a NaNo project.
Now I'm going to say something inflammatory. There's been a huge pile of dramatic crap about some trash that happened on television this week apparently. Yet another "slur" on the fandom, etc. etc. Two things about that, folks. First of all, it's television. Television is all pretty much crap. It's like tabloid newspapers, you know, the ones in the supermarket with headlines like "Space Aliens Secretly Control Congress" or "Jesus Appears on Jay Leno"? People who want to believe that junk are going to believe it no matter what you say or do. Secondly, though, before you protest too much, it seems to me that furry fandom really is badly fixated on sexuality and losing sight of the art, literature, and other forms of anthropomorphism that are supposedly the core on which it stands.
Yes, going on a television talk show and proclaiming your bizarre sexual fetishes is pretty damned stupid. There's no other word for it. But pointing your paw/muzzle/fin/horn/whatever at someone who did such a stupid thing and blaming them for the bad reputation you think the fandom has? That's equally stupid. The bad reputation would die a deserved death if there were no truth in it. Unfortunately, the is some truth in it and that's enough to keep it alive and make the muck rakers looking for drama and sensational stories come back again and again. What is FA full of? What is YiffStar full of? What are Tapestries and FurryMuck full of? Ask your furry friends why they go to conventions and what they do there. Then tell me there is no truth to the popular perception that furries are obsessed with sexuality. And until you can honestly say that, I will not be impressed with tantrums about "the media" and "stupid spotlight seekers."
Gasoline prices keep dropping. I paid $2.42 this afternoon, which is the lowest in months though certainly not the lowest in the last year. We bottomed out at $1.45 last December, which must have been the lowest price around here in several years. Farther back than any records I have, at least.
Days keep ticking off too without my getting the work finished that must be done in the next couple of weeks in order to make it into the Fiber shows in October.
Garden lettuce is all gone, or nearly so, but the hot frame yielded mustard greens, arugula, and cilantro for a salad tonight, and added lettuce from the supermarket. It was tasty.
Time to think about NaNoWriMo. Since I will not be interrupting November to attend MFF this year, I should be able to exceed the 50K word quota if I plan my time correctly. The question is, do I return to Argos and Fennec, or perhaps to Jake and Chrysios? I've had a couple of people urging me to revisit Menander even, but I'm not sure he ever attracted a lot of interest. There's at least one side story to Argos and Fennec, as well, and that would be Inspector Hammel's story explaining where he was before he came to Westvale, and how he first met Fennec. It's a good story, but I'm not sure it's large enough for a NaNo project.
Now I'm going to say something inflammatory. There's been a huge pile of dramatic crap about some trash that happened on television this week apparently. Yet another "slur" on the fandom, etc. etc. Two things about that, folks. First of all, it's television. Television is all pretty much crap. It's like tabloid newspapers, you know, the ones in the supermarket with headlines like "Space Aliens Secretly Control Congress" or "Jesus Appears on Jay Leno"? People who want to believe that junk are going to believe it no matter what you say or do. Secondly, though, before you protest too much, it seems to me that furry fandom really is badly fixated on sexuality and losing sight of the art, literature, and other forms of anthropomorphism that are supposedly the core on which it stands.
Yes, going on a television talk show and proclaiming your bizarre sexual fetishes is pretty damned stupid. There's no other word for it. But pointing your paw/muzzle/fin/horn/whatever at someone who did such a stupid thing and blaming them for the bad reputation you think the fandom has? That's equally stupid. The bad reputation would die a deserved death if there were no truth in it. Unfortunately, the is some truth in it and that's enough to keep it alive and make the muck rakers looking for drama and sensational stories come back again and again. What is FA full of? What is YiffStar full of? What are Tapestries and FurryMuck full of? Ask your furry friends why they go to conventions and what they do there. Then tell me there is no truth to the popular perception that furries are obsessed with sexuality. And until you can honestly say that, I will not be impressed with tantrums about "the media" and "stupid spotlight seekers."
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 08:21 pm (UTC)By the way, you were going to say something inflammatory?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 04:58 am (UTC)O furries, let him among you who is without sin cast the first stone!
"Oh, I was... fursuiting. Yeah, that's it."
Date: 2009-09-18 03:11 am (UTC)Or better yet, ask them how come sometimes you DON'T see them for long periods of time at furry cons (that they attended). ;-)
*chuckles*
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 04:15 am (UTC)In regard to "teh drama," I'll agree that furries make their own gravy, so when they end up stewing in it, there's no surprise. The only thing that bothers me is that a whole string of minor media skirmishes does end up cumulatively forming a public perception, so each time somebody pulls this stunt (usually once a year or so), it inches people's first impressions of furry over into the "-" zone. It used to be "Ha ha, weirdos, but harmless" but lately it seems like it's more "Ewww...weirdos and sexual deviants!" But I suppose for a fandom that regularly and openly associates itself with multiple fetishes, maybe it's surprising that the "fandom"'s reputation isn't worse than it is.
I haven't forgotten about the wolf fur, either. I've been up against the pin all week, so I haven't had a chance to get the package out..will try this weekend. :3
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 04:48 am (UTC)You've got a different take than me on why all the whining about the fandom is dumb - me, I honestly don't think the fandom's reputation is as bad as people make it out to be. Pretty much the only people that've EVER given me shit about it are people who already wanted to give me shit (or, indirectly given me shit, people who make it their purpose in life to mock anything remotely mockable, people like the ED editors, and I don't consider anything they say to be indicative of the public at large), and I'm quite upfront about the fact that I do porn.
There are two primary reasons why furries get attention on ED (well, for ED, there's also furry drama, which can be quite spectacular), SA, and other such "we're only on the Internet because it lets us be assholes without consequence" sites.
First, furries are easy to mock. You have to be at least a little into e.g. anime to understand how silly some of the things that go on at anime cons are, but furry activities are silly without familiarity to a much greater degree. Less effort required = more mocking done.
Second, furries as a whole are absolutely stellar at twitching. You poke them, they twitch. And flinch. And flail. And make a spectacle of themselves. They seem to often lack the ability to laugh at themselves, which makes them into better target for that kind of people.
But that kind of people are still a vocal minority.
-Alexandra
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:47 am (UTC)You know, the CSI episode "Fur and Loathing" was 6 years ago already. SIX YEARS. I don't think there's been any major bits of "bad press" since then. But with the way some are reacting, you'd think this happens OMG every single day...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 07:41 am (UTC)*sighs whistfully.
I agree with your point on the furore surrounding this talk show thing. I think it's a little too close to the truth for some people to accept, and that's the reason for a lot of the anger. It’s clear that's what the media will seek, and then everyone seems surprised when they act according to type.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 09:36 am (UTC)As a society, we're pretty suppressed in our sexuality. We don't talk about it, and we don't express it, and it gets buried away. Furry is a chance to explore that without the limits of normal society. We're a pretty open minded bunch, but that makes us vulnerable to being exploited as well, so it's a double edged razor. The problem arises when it looks like the only reason we exist.
Maybe it's just me, but furry is how I like to think it would be if we didn't have all the human issues to deal with. It's the ultimate escapist fantasy. To live in a world that's simpler, more pure of intention, cleaner and nicer. To experience that simple joy of endlessly chasing a ball across the yard or lounging in the sun, in plain sight, yet hidden. Curling up in a nice warm den in the winter with a mate. Does sex factor into that? Of course it does, but it's not the reason I'm furry.
Sabot left a comment in my LJ, "The first rule of Fursuit Sex Club is that you don't talk about Fursuit Sex Club", and I think that pretty well sums it up.
Then again I'm 40 and never even had a steady, so what the hell do I know?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 09:43 am (UTC)Furry drama: ...and furry fandom's ability to get itself wound up by representations of itself on trash TV and the like is deeply depressing. I've even seen folks making death threats, FFS.
Re: "Oh, I was... fursuiting. Yeah, that's it."
Date: 2009-09-18 11:16 am (UTC)Of course in a fandom so heavily loaded with hormones due to the immature age of most of the participants, some of this is inevitable. I still feel as if I need to disinfect myself if I spend any time combing through sites like FA for the genuine artwork. The trouble is, it's there. Superb, great master level work, right on FA. Who'd have thought it? Vastly underappreciated by the crowd that tramples on it while sniffing around for the porn, but nonetheless, it exists.
Not everyone goes to furry conventions to have sex. In fact, relatively few of my friends network go there with that in mind at all. But there are enough who do that it lends validity to the accusations. Weaving the analogy out of wool, which is apt for me at least, if you blend ten fleeces together and only nine of them are white, the mixture is still going to be gray in the end.
The gay movement mostly got past this in the end, though it was a screaming drama issue back in the 1970s. "Do we let the leather queens, the trannies, and the NAMBLA people into our parade? They make us look bad. The media focuses on them and makes it sound as if we all are that way..."
I dunno. I hear the same people saying on one day "I can't admit to my boss/mother/girlfriend that I'm a furry, because they'll think I'm a pervert," and the next day they are drooling over some cheap, badly drawn pornographic image of a fox and two elephants doing something absolutely impossible. I want to bite them, shake them by the neck, and scream at them, "You ARE a pervert. Grow up and come to terms with it."
I am a furry. I have been a furry for at least something like 54 years now. If it has a sexual element for me, that's buried very deeply indeed and never surfaces. I do resent the stereotypes, the drama, and the obsession with sex. But it doesn't change my own attachment to the images and central concepts. Even so, I don't think all this drama achieves a thing. It just emphasizes the idiocy. The lady doth protest too much for there to be no truth in the accusation.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:24 am (UTC)The "Ewww...weirdos and sexual deviants" accusation comes, we have to remember, from people who actually waste their time and brain cells watching these trash television programs. Based on that information alone, I'm willing to discount their opinions completely just as I discount the opinions of someone who "learned all about gays by watching that interview on Donohue with the three porn stars" back in the 80s. Right, sure you did.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:31 am (UTC)The same attitudes that make same sex marriage a show stopping, warfare inspiring issue here are the things that lie behind the conflicted, twitchy behavior of furries.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:35 am (UTC)Gas prices will go back up, I'm sure. Big oil controls them, and for whatever reason, they want them low right now. Probably it has to do with politics and making people forget about energy and global warming issues so that profitability goes back up in the long term.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:45 am (UTC)As I said above, it's partly the problem that the fandom is dominated by late teens and early twenties with raging hormones. They are unable to distinguish the effects of their very human hormones from the essence of their furry beings. The critters they admire. Most of those totemic animals engage in mating behavior only once or twice a year and are quite uninterested in it the rest of the time. ;p
As for that last bit, I admit I'm puzzled. You look like a darned good catch to me and I can only guess that you've been too busy working and hiding out in your den for anyone to latch onto you.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:51 am (UTC)I've seen the CSI episode. It's crap, of course, and anyone with half a brain can see that. I won't be looking at the current thing, because I don't waste time on talk show drivel.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 11:58 am (UTC)Kudos! Zoomorphs is not a dirty word!
...toonophilia on the other hand has that double meaning ;o)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 12:46 pm (UTC)Is it already cool enough to need a hot frame up there? The mustard greens sound wonderful and now I’m craving a giant bowl of them sautéed with garlic, onion and crumbled bacon.
Furries, An Outsiders Point of View
I’m not a furry. Never have been, probably never will be. Up until a couple of months ago, my only knowledge of furries was what I had seen at sci-fi conventions for the past 25 years. Nothing I saw there put furries in a good light.
I was raised to think for myself, and not to let others do my thinking for me. One of the best ways I found to do this was to simply ask the people involved what something was about. And so when I met Altivo on LJ a few months ago, I sent him a very timid email asking him to help me understand the furry community. I was really embarrassed to explain my then-current views on furries because I already knew they were really skewed. I was sure I was going to receive an absolutely scathing letter in return. To my surprise I instead received a well-thought out response and he encouraged me to ask more questions and to contact others as well. So while I have no intention in joining the furry community, I can certainly appreciate it for what it is; a community of people with a common interest in nature and the animal kingdom. At least that’s how I see the ones here on LJ.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:31 pm (UTC)The same would be true of furries. Let the bad ones claim all the publicity and they will own the name and keep the rest of us hiding in a closet. We need more self-promotion, not less, but it should be based on things we do that everyone can appreciate, such as the charity funds raised at conventions or the socially favorable activities of some fursuiters, artists, and writers.
The incident to which I referred apparently involves a couple of self-styled "furries" who went onto one of those abusive television talk shows and essentially presented furry fandom as "people who like to have sex while dressed as animals." Obviously, there are some people like that who involve themselves in some furry fandom activities, for equally obvious reasons. But the ignorance and narrow views of these two characters and of the talk show host cannot be allowed to stand for all of us.
I'm reminded of David Ruben, the 70s author of self-help sex books, who interviewed a few gay men he found hanging around in public restrooms and allowed that to stand for all homosexuals everywhere. Both the author and his interviewees were completely ignorant of the breadth and depth of gay expression and experience, yet they made all-encompassing pronouncements on the subject and were believed by many outsiders for a number of years.
Not to say that furry fandom is a gay movement in any particular way, but there are certainly parallels that should apply. This is why I do not hide my connection with the fandom, and instead try to leverage it (subtly) whenever possible.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:43 pm (UTC)GUILTY! Granted, I was a furry before I even knew what Furries were, growing up with books like Richard Scary, Merry Melodies cartoons, etc. I was 18 or so when I found out about "Furries" and I was in my early 20's when I first logged into FurryMUCK. I'll admit that originally I was there for the TS, but over the years I've toned that down a lot and now I go there mostly to chat with friends I've made over the years. Some I only know online, other's have been RL friends for many years. In fact, the person I "blame" for introducing me to the fandon is a friend that I flew up here for my wedding five years ago. :)
Maturity does have a lot to do with things. Once I got a house of my own, I spent far less time online as I had more important things to do; gardening, lawn-care, household maintainance and projects, etc. Once I got married, it was obviously more important to be spending snuggle-times with my spouse than yiffing online. Fortunately, Trixstir likes Furries too, so it's something we can both enjoy when we have time to. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:45 pm (UTC)Therianthropes are an even more peculiar and marginal group. Some of them are furries, some deny being furries, and even more interestingly, most of them seem to hate each other for some reason. Yet they show up at furry gatherings and even hold panels and discussions there.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 05:53 pm (UTC)No, the hot frame is not necessary yet. I just planted stuff in it back in July because it was vacant and conveniently located. We removed the top, and it is just acting as a raised bed. It's almost time though. Around the first frost, we plant spinach and lettuce in it and reattach the top. If conditions cooperate and we remember to ventilate and water as needed, we end up with fresh greens to pick during the holidays. That's always fun.
You've almost got the furry thing right now. The common interest, though, is in art (graphic arts, sculpture, decorative arts, film animation, writing, music, etc.) that depicts animals, especially animals with some human traits superimposed. That is the central commonality of all these overlapping groups that make up furry fandom. Charitable works are a popular activity and almost always involved when there is a convention. Most of that charity does go to nature and animal-related organizations, which shows that a large percentage of furry fans are in fact interested in nature and the animal kingdom as it really exists, as well as the fantasy animal kingdom inside our imaginations.
When and where all this emphasis on sex came into it, I'm not at all sure. It is certainly not the essential core of commonality, no matter how much a few people try to make it so.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 06:00 pm (UTC)Being utterly obsessed with the "animal stories" section of the library as a kid, though, and devoted to seeing every animated film with animal characters as many times as possible... Yes, that fits me. I engaged in live role playing of animal characters when I was in elementary school. Some of the girls who were heavy readers were into that, of course the boys thought it was "sissy stuff" but they treated reading itself as that too. After all, it wasn't baseball.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 11:21 pm (UTC)From The Bear, James Oliver Curwood: Bruce Otto cussing about generalizations, and some of the "fool things" you read in books.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-19 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-20 07:06 am (UTC)I do tend to focus on the funnies and the naughties in the artworld but I'm a simple cat and tend to find the people who do the two subjects well do other subjects well too :)