Short meme
Oct. 29th, 2008 06:45 amFrom
calydor:
The first time you communicated in real-time between continents, what was going through your mind?
It was an amateur radio contact with a station in Europe, using very little power and a simple piece of wire as an antenna. My thoughts both during and afterward were largely centered on the feeling that it was simply impossible. How can the amount of electricity needed to power a night light bulb be adequate to send a clear signal over 4000 miles? It still amazes me, and makes it easy to understand why demonstrations of both the wired telegraph and later wireless telegraphy were treated as hoaxes by so many people. It looks and feels like pure witchcraft.
The first time you communicated in real-time between continents, what was going through your mind?
It was an amateur radio contact with a station in Europe, using very little power and a simple piece of wire as an antenna. My thoughts both during and afterward were largely centered on the feeling that it was simply impossible. How can the amount of electricity needed to power a night light bulb be adequate to send a clear signal over 4000 miles? It still amazes me, and makes it easy to understand why demonstrations of both the wired telegraph and later wireless telegraphy were treated as hoaxes by so many people. It looks and feels like pure witchcraft.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 12:01 pm (UTC)But it is interesting to see how a low-strength signal can travel around th world like that.
*nuzzles* And there is that 30/30 icon again. Have you seen any BraveStarr episodes yet? ^.^
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 12:08 pm (UTC)Nope, haven't yet seen any actual BraveStarr episodes.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 03:37 pm (UTC)Bravestarr
Date: 2008-10-29 06:35 pm (UTC)Re: Bravestarr
Date: 2008-10-29 07:51 pm (UTC)Re: Bravestarr
Date: 2008-10-29 08:04 pm (UTC)*puts on 30/30 suit and goes to visit SoanoS*
Re: Bravestarr
Date: 2008-10-30 12:05 pm (UTC)*runs to the cutie cyborg horse and licks, hugs and nuzzles all over*
Yes. Adorable :)
Re: Bravestarr
Date: 2008-10-30 03:21 pm (UTC)Eek! Ack! Wait! *pant* Stop, that tickles!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:55 pm (UTC)And yes, you definitely need to watch Bravestarr. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 12:32 pm (UTC)I still remember how when connecting to an international call you'd have that little beep indicating that you're successfully connected via satellite... I think the first instance of actual real-time communication was when I used to dial into some manufacturer's mailbox (I think it was National Semiconductor or Texas Instruments or something) by way of the AT&T calling card service. You could call them for free in Germany, then tell the automated system to connect you to an 800 number, which, due to a terrible miscalculation on part of the owner of tne number, was actually reachable for free from AT&T's service, then connect to the bulletin board that was running on that number and navigate to the live chat. I think I used this thing a few times to discuss stuff with a person I met on Fidonet, and I think they closed this loophole circa late 1994.
This was, of course, back in the day when the standard tariff to the US was DM 4 a _minute_. When I last had to use dial-up extensively in 2004, it was actually cheaper to dial into an ISP in Seattle (for 1 cent a minute) than to connect to a local modem pool at 2.9ct/minute....
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 12:36 pm (UTC)"Wireless radio" is still the technology that we depend upon for satellites, space probes, and outer space communication.
Witchcraft!
Date: 2008-10-29 12:44 pm (UTC)Re: Witchcraft!
Date: 2008-10-29 01:28 pm (UTC)non-sequitur
Date: 2008-10-29 02:49 pm (UTC)Re: non-sequitur
Date: 2008-10-29 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 03:48 pm (UTC)and wanted to test it. So I did digital telephony.
This was about, oh, 94. I "called" a guy in London
and chatted for awhile. He told me about the weather
and he turned out to be an American ex-pat. I
got him to agree to work for the NS
*test tone*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 06:22 pm (UTC)As for LED lightbulbs: HELL YES! I've got a little pocket-luxeon flashlight that's utterly startling when turned on at night, it's like a 5-cell Maglight... Yet it's tiny and takes 3 AAA cells. I've been watching things like this: http://store.lsgc.com/ They have a 60-watt equivalent but it's still pretty steep, 150 bucks. Soon as they can manage 100 watt equivalent in Warm White for under a hundred, I'm gonna be ALL over 'em!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 06:37 pm (UTC)Incidentally, FidoNet was also the facilitator for my first cross-continent communication attempts, too - although IIRC, the very first attempt actually failed (I'd send a PM to a US-American guy posting on the English AD&D board on Fido, but never received a reply). Still, fun times.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:39 pm (UTC)But the simplicity of good old radio traffic still beats all that. =)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:45 pm (UTC)Even more amazing today are the digital radio modes that use a computer sound card to generate the signal and receive it. Not as fast as some analog modems, but able to get a signal through or hear and decode it under incredible conditions. My computer is able to find and decode transmissions that I can't even hear in the headphones. (And I have above average hearing, too.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 07:54 pm (UTC)I gather it's something about sending and listening the signal in broad spectrum amidst the background noise. Requires a bit more than one transistor though, but it's still fancy.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-29 09:54 pm (UTC)So, I've only used a PK-232 hardware interface and more recently the various sound card based programs. The largest and heaviest equipment I've actually seen or touched was an old ASCI teletype "pedestal" machine with a 300 baud analog telephone modem in it. ASR-32? Someone gave it to me back in the mid-90s and it sat in the basement of the house for a couple of years before being passed on to someone else.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-30 03:24 pm (UTC)http://cgi.ebay.com/BRAVESTARR-Original-Animation-Art-Cel-Draw-30-30_W0QQitemZ270294636104QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item270294636104&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A1%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14