Earth shaking news
Feb. 10th, 2010 10:05 pmOr not. Today was all a-dither here in northern Illinois about the horrible, scary earthquake that hit just before 4 am this morning. I listened silently to several accounts of how frightening it was, and read several more online. All I can think is that this reaction must have been occasioned by bad dreams about the Haiti quake of last month, which was thousands of times more powerful.
The expert assessments I found put the thing at 3.8 on the Richter scale, which is barely enough to rattle the dishes. One stated that it wasn't enough to make ripples in the lake. I'm inclined to agree. I sleep on a water bed, am a light sleeper, and was in fact awake at that time and didn't feel it. Our two dogs did not wake up or act in any way bothered, and one of them normally barks instantly if you so much as step near him when he's asleep. Late this afternoon I realized another piece of evidence exists. I have several weight driven pendulum clocks in the house. These are hung on walls facing every direction. Most of them stop if you leave a window open and the breeze blows on them, or if you slam a door. Brushing against the chains or weights, even very slightly, is enough to stop them. None of them stopped. Either that earthquake was a lot weaker than what people are making it out to be, or our house is standing on some sort of shock absorber. This doesn't even take into account the precarious piles of books and papers in my study, none of which was disturbed in the least by the tremor, even though just sitting down too heavily in the desk chair can cause them to tip and collapse. ;p
I think I probably mistook it for a passing snowplow, something we have been getting regularly the last couple of nights.
More chatter about Google's newest gadget, called "Buzz," which appears to be sort of a cross between Twitter and Facebook. It was dropped on Gmail users gradually throughout the day, and finally appeared in my inbox around 4 pm. Not so much as a "Do you want this?" or a message telling me how to get rid of it, much less how to make use of it. As far as I can see, it looks like a Facebook "wall" and is rather slow and cumbersome to act on commands. Of course, "ponderous" is a good description of many of Google's products. None of them are zippy, most of them eat lots of memory and bandwidth.
In spite of being W-day, got some things done. That includes stretching some more paper, so a painting should be forthcoming in the next day or two...
The expert assessments I found put the thing at 3.8 on the Richter scale, which is barely enough to rattle the dishes. One stated that it wasn't enough to make ripples in the lake. I'm inclined to agree. I sleep on a water bed, am a light sleeper, and was in fact awake at that time and didn't feel it. Our two dogs did not wake up or act in any way bothered, and one of them normally barks instantly if you so much as step near him when he's asleep. Late this afternoon I realized another piece of evidence exists. I have several weight driven pendulum clocks in the house. These are hung on walls facing every direction. Most of them stop if you leave a window open and the breeze blows on them, or if you slam a door. Brushing against the chains or weights, even very slightly, is enough to stop them. None of them stopped. Either that earthquake was a lot weaker than what people are making it out to be, or our house is standing on some sort of shock absorber. This doesn't even take into account the precarious piles of books and papers in my study, none of which was disturbed in the least by the tremor, even though just sitting down too heavily in the desk chair can cause them to tip and collapse. ;p
I think I probably mistook it for a passing snowplow, something we have been getting regularly the last couple of nights.
More chatter about Google's newest gadget, called "Buzz," which appears to be sort of a cross between Twitter and Facebook. It was dropped on Gmail users gradually throughout the day, and finally appeared in my inbox around 4 pm. Not so much as a "Do you want this?" or a message telling me how to get rid of it, much less how to make use of it. As far as I can see, it looks like a Facebook "wall" and is rather slow and cumbersome to act on commands. Of course, "ponderous" is a good description of many of Google's products. None of them are zippy, most of them eat lots of memory and bandwidth.
In spite of being W-day, got some things done. That includes stretching some more paper, so a painting should be forthcoming in the next day or two...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 07:59 am (UTC)I didn't notice Buzz because I use an offline email client, but I'm not too excited about it. It's just another walled garden like Facebook is, that's non-interoperable / non-open source and is supported by ads. At least, as near as I can tell.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 12:30 pm (UTC)Last week's sample here.
My boss says now I have to illustrate my own stories, and the thought has crossed my mind before, but I don't know where the time would come from.
I'm not really sure what Google is up to with this Buzz thing, aside from their apparent plans to take over the entire world, crush enemies under their feet, and hear the lamentations of the women.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 06:50 pm (UTC)(Nice work, BTW.)
Google found a huge lode of pure money. Some of what they do with it is pretty nice. Other things, not so much. If Denise / Synecdochic is right, though, the money's going to run out sooner or later. And I'm not sure Google has a business model other than selling ads. Although I have to give them credit for being smart.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-15 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 08:27 pm (UTC)Now, where's that alleged opt-out option, I wonder...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 08:42 pm (UTC)I did not permit them to push to all of my Gmail contact list, but they "automatically" set me up to follow my "most frequently contacted" (however that is determined, it's a secret apparently) which added up to about 16 people. They did the same to other people who "frequently contact" me, so I already had followers as soon as I entered the application. The damage is done so I'm letting it run for a few days, but I expect it will quickly develop into something as spammy and useless as Facebook is.
I also expect Twitter-style spammers and spambots to appear before long. They just have to find some different algorithm of attack, but I'm sure the means are there.
The "opt out" after you're in the system is apparently hidden in very tiny print at the bottom of the "Edit Profile" page.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 08:53 pm (UTC)...at least, according to this story and reports I had from another friend who found he'd inadvertently revealed a friend's full real name...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 10:13 pm (UTC)I don't have to completely disable the thing just yet, because I severely pruned my contact list immediately and have since hidden it. But there are other issues. Twitter doesn't allow people to follow you without your knowledge, and does allow you to block them if they seem at all suspicious or aren't revealing enough about their identity to satisfy you. I block new followers constantly there because I have no idea who they are or why they should be following me. Buzz allows them to follow you anonymously if they hide or erase their Google profile. Worse, if you can't get to their profile you can't block them. Now that is severely unacceptable. Stalking anyone? Bosses snooping on employees?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 11:01 am (UTC)Of course, all geologists in every area of globe tell the locals that "You're overdue for the Big One," every time someone else has a major quake.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 01:02 pm (UTC)Quakes may concentrate around the edges of tectonic plates, but every place on Earth is vulnerable, and the "it will never happen here" or "will never happen to me" mentality is a very dangerous faith to live by.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 12:48 pm (UTC)Sounds like it just triggered people's inate fears rather than anything important. My first earthquake which I felt while visiting my Grandparents in a suburb of Tokyo just felt like a low flying jet. I was in bed at the time which had something to do with how I felt it.
Yahoo has something similar to Buzz but I don't bother with it either :)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:53 pm (UTC)No one has done anything about the unsafe construction in Florida hurricane zones or the houses rebuilt again and again on Mississippi River flood plains, so getting them to spend money on earthquake protection is extremely unlikely.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 12:52 am (UTC)I'm a bit surprised you of all people would make such an ignorant statement, Altivo. The Midwest has experienced very large earthquakes that have literally changed the landscape. The piece of the state of Missouri where New Madrid is, for instance, has its unique geopolitical boundaries due to a significant earthquake that radically altered the course of a boundary river. The New Madrid earthquakes were felt from New Orleans into Canada and themselves are a threat to the Chicago area despite how far they seem.
It may not be particularly likely that it will happen tomorrow, but those areas have been hit by very serious earthquakes and, sooner or later, they will again.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 01:40 am (UTC)Everything in life is a crap shoot, when you come down to it, and there's only so much we can do about the odds. You'll notice that I don't live in a high rise building, never have, and never will. A tornado could still get me, though, and that's much more likely here in the midwest than death by earthquake.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 03:04 pm (UTC)I did feel a similar quake from Illinois several years back. Though where I was in Wisconsin it was only in the 1.8-2.0 range. It felt like a truck driving down the road when there wasn't.
As for the internet tapeworm Google, I virtually boycott them. I've had enough of their lack of respect for privacy. Some things like their 'Docs' have user agreements that are jaw-dropping bad.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 11:32 pm (UTC)Nobody said anything about Earthquakes when I signed up for this cruise.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-12 02:01 am (UTC)