altivo: Clydesdale Pegasus (pegasus)
Order placed August 25, 2021. Yesterday I (finally) took delivery on my little truck.

2022 Maverick Portrait

2022 Maverick Profile

We are pretty pleased with it. (Especially since I got back over 80% of what I paid for the temporary wheels last September when I traded that car in.) The hybrid is great. For the trip home from the dealership (~12 miles) plus a trip into Marengo to the insurance agent to change my insurance over (~8 miles round trip,) the trip meter shows it got 38.4 miles per gallon and ran about a third of that time on the electric motor alone. I drive like a grandma, which probably helps. But at the gas prices we've had lately, this is really good news. Also, despite some reviewers who complained it was noisy, we found it was very smooth and quiet. So quiet that neither of us could tell when it switched between electric and ICE power, which it must have done several times. No, "it doesn't sound like a truck." And despite that appearing in several reviews, I'm quite delighted with that. Easy to drive, very much like my old Escape carryall. Steering seemed a bit stiff, but after I got the steering wheel position and seat adjusted a bit, that feeling went away.

The ride is a bit stiffer than our recent passenger cars have been, but it IS a truck after all. I have driven a pick-up truck only once before this, for a short round trip when friends gave us some gates they no longer needed to use on our pasture fences. Gilbert lent us his truck for that, and since it had a manual transmission I was the driver. Gary F. doesn't like dealing with a clutch and shifter, and I'm used to it.

There are a lot of features to learn, and kinks to get used to. I'm only 100 pages into the owner's manual of 560 pages length, so it'll take a while. But I've got the basics down, and sales rep Anthony helped me get the FordPass app on my phone linked to the car's internals. It uses two different bluetooth linkages. Another thing to explore and learn.

Two silly but best things so far: the little "cubby hole" in the dash next to the 8 inch "infotainment" touch screen is just the right size for the little beany baby dog that looks like my old and still missed pet, Simon; and the back-up alarm which is required on all trucks now is just plain cute (sounds like one of those wind-up monkey toys that bang two tiny cymbals together over and over.)

Was it worth the excessively long wait? In my case, yes, but I'm sure glad it's over.
altivo: Clydesdale Pegasus (pegasus)
Today Ford informed me (at 7 pm) that my 2022 Maverick was built today and is about to undergo final inspection and testing. After that it gets shipped by rail from Hermosillo Mexico to my Ford dealer here in Illinois. Estimate on that is three to four weeks time. All in all, that adds up to almost exactly TEN months from a confirmed order to actual delivery of the vehicle.

I looked up the estimated trade-in value of my 2016 Fusion and was very surprised at how high it is. There has been a lot of talk in the news about used car prices skyrocketing in the recent months, and this might be proof. I paid $13K for the Fusion, used, last September. Granted I've not put a lot of miles on it in the interim, but even so, the estimated trade-in supplied by Ford's website is in the range of $9K to $11K. The high end of that is about half the total cost of the new truck.

Anyway, the waiting should be just about over with. Talk is that US automakers are pushing to go to ALL custom orders like that from buyers, rather than letting dealers order "stock" to display and sell from their lots. I suspect with wait times like this, that just isn't going to fly very well with either the customers or the dealers.

[Edit, May 13] Moving fast now. They've already "shipped" it, or so they say. I suspect that means it has been loaded onto a railroad car, not necessarily that it has yet left the factory. But their estimated arrival date here is second week of June. That'll do.
altivo: Blinking Altivo (altivo blink)
Amid a lot of irritating nuisances yesterday there came a surprise bit of goodness:

Ford sent an e-mail telling me that my long-awaited Maverick pickup truck is now scheduled to be built in April. That will be eight months since I ordered it and put down my deposit.

I continue to be amused by "criticisms" from various sources. Consumer Reports listed four things they didn't like about the Maverick. One was that "it doesn't sound like a truck." Idiots.

It's a hybrid vehicle. Yes, they don't sound like a dinosaur farting. Or smell like one for that matter. They DO, however reduce carbon emissions and fossil fuel consumption, both of which characteristics I happen to like very much.

I can use a little humor. The season of mud is upon us, definitely not my favorite time.
altivo: Rearing Clydesdale (angry rearing)
Background: On August 24 of last year I actually ordered a new vehicle, a Ford Maverick. In case you aren't exposed to vehicular media, that's a compact pick-up truck, not the muscle car that once was sold under the same name. My truck has yet to even be scheduled for production, so I've not even seen it. Ford is moving awfully slow at producing these, apparently in part because they got far more orders than anticipated, and most of the orders were for the hybrid power train that they didn't expect would be so popular. After all, it doesn't have as high a horsepower rating. (Come on, Ford, climate change is real and your customers are aware of it whether you are or not.)

Anyway, this has spread my e-mail around to any number of sources for auto and truck stuff, filling my mailbox with a lot of trash as well as some useful information.

I chose the smallest truck because it was 1) all I needed; 2) much more fuel-efficient, especially in the hybrid version; and 3) attractively priced. It helped that reviewers compared its driving characteristics favorably to my previous car, a Ford Escape, and that they described it as "smooth and quiet."

Now come several articles along the lines of this one:
https://carbuzz.com/news/new-dual-tip-exhaust-now-available-for-ford-maverick

Jeez, if people want a noisy, smelly truck, why don't they just buy one? Why are they buying one designed to be fuel-efficient and quiet and immediately modifying it to make offensive and irritating noise? There are thousands of new and used trucks available to make disgusting noise with. Most of them will also do "0 to 60" much faster than a hybrid Maverick does.

I guess this is why I'm an equine. Humans are irritatingly stupid.
altivo: Blinking Altivo (altivo blink)
This is something I never would have expected, but it really happened this year. I wish my Dad were still around to comment on it. (He worked for GM, actually, which would have made it entertaining.)

Some are undoubtedly aware that Ford introduced a completely new model this year (2022, since automobile/truck model years generally run six months ahead or so.) That would be the Maverick.

What? Wait, didn't they market the Maverick some 40 years ago or more? Yeah, but that was something else. They apparently have run out of names and trademarks and are recycling some that were long retired. This Maverick is a compact pick-up truck. No kidding.

Aside from not coming up with a new name, the idea seemed viable. Trucks seem to grow in size even faster than luxury SUVs. The ones that used to be single row seating utility vehicles 20 years ago have grown into super cab-crew monster trucks with huge gas guzzling engines and tires that at least seem as big as the ones that used to be on my uncle's farm tractor when I was a kid.

According to some sources, the idea was to market a less expensive truck with available off-road features and better fuel economy that might (they hoped) appeal to a younger audience who care about climate change, pollution, and (not to mention) expenses. So...

The new 2022 Maverick was born. The base model has a fuel efficient hybrid power train to help Ford with those overall figures needed to meet Federal standards, and has a price (before adding any extras) to be under $20K. Unbelievable. But they did it, came up with the designs in part by recycling ideas and parts they had already used in other models. The unibody design is based on a Bronco design. The power train (IC engine and electric motors) had already been used in the Escape, etc. They promoted this idea well, opened up a queue for "reservations" that lead to actual firm orders, and the circus train was on the road.

Their mistakes were big, though. They clearly underestimated the popularity of the idea, and were quickly swamped with orders. They also seem to have expected that most customers would opt for the EcoBoost turbocharged engine rather than the hybrid (at about $1200 more in cost) since everyone knows that truck buyers like the biggest, noisiest engines they can get. They planned to produce only 30 to 35% hybrids and the rest would have the EcoBoost engine. Production was scheduled for the plant in Hermosillo, Mexico, which has handled the Escape, the Bronco, and the Ranger pick-up in the past (and still does.)

Surprise, though. The orders that poured in ran more like 70% for the less expensive, more efficient hybrid engine. The buyers were often first-time truck buyers, but also older than the expected market slice. These were people who actually cared about pollution, climate change, and waste, who had been waiting for an affordable hybrid or electric vehicle.

Ford's supply chains for some of the hybrid parts, like the larger batteries needed, were not up to meeting the demands. Hybrid production (when it started at last) was a trickle while the plant kept cranking out EcoBoost version vehicles to meet orders only a couple of weeks old and hybrid buyers were kept waiting for months. Only now, in November, is Ford starting to move along to actually fulfill its promises to those who placed orders; and they find themselves forced to apologize for their misjudgments and poor projections.

There are good lessons here, though. Firstly, whether politicians and plutocrats admit it or not, more people do feel concern about climate change and fossil fuel consumption than expected. Vehicle buyers are not impressed only by big roaring engines and sleek designs. And, most importantly, if you announce a better mousetrap, you'd better be prepared to deliver it on the schedule you promise or you'll end up looking like a foolish skunk with stolen eggshells stuck to its face.

Edit: I should have mentioned this. The EPA fuel economy numbers for the Maverick hybrid, when they came out, were 42 mpg city driving, 33 mpg highway, and 37 mpg combined. That only increased the demand, of course. Conservative drivers like myself often can get two or three more miles per gallon than the EPA tests show, too.

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
345678 9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 07:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios